Re: SETTINGS error handling
Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Tue, 16 July 2013 12:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF5611E8195 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q+GNceuhY4Rw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B907411E80D7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Uz4Hb-0000E5-3p for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:23:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:23:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uz4Hb-0000E5-3p@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1Uz4HS-0000D5-LV for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:22:58 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1Uz4HL-0005RE-8U for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:22:58 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.218] (ip202-27-218-168.satlan.co.nz [202.27.218.168]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAF1E6EAF for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:22:28 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <51E53B00.1090504@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:22:24 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <CAOdDvNoPRmM-8hpbrCoQ4GQFJTd0qPjONTyJuF6Pu2UhoyQ_zA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVretqeOtEFr=9zHbP77UtS4AyA9YfnSVXUNaz5rSytQA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVretqeOtEFr=9zHbP77UtS4AyA9YfnSVXUNaz5rSytQA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.267, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Uz4HL-0005RE-8U 52365f5ae7511fbc9cf84849b5f788ac
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SETTINGS error handling
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51E53B00.1090504@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18806
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 16/07/2013 10:20 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote: > On 15 July 2013 12:44, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote: >> I'm wondering why the text proscribes error handling of MUST ignore in >> response to violation of the MUST NOT send provision. > I think that someone either caught Postel's DIsease, or is in remission. > >> Can we either change it to PROTOCOL ERROR (preferred) or just be silent on >> handling of the error? > PROTOCOL_ERROR seems appropriate. > > Opened: > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/174 +1. And double that for more strictness everywhere. Amos
- SETTINGS error handling Patrick McManus
- Re: SETTINGS error handling Martin Thomson
- Re: SETTINGS error handling Amos Jeffries
- Re: SETTINGS error handling Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: SETTINGS error handling Roberto Peon
- Re: SETTINGS error handling Roberto Peon
- Re: SETTINGS error handling Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa