Re: HTTP/2 : problem with section 3.5 Connection setup magic
Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Tue, 16 July 2013 12:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7165811E8195 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuXoIIAjRbSn for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE17811E80D7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Uz4Jx-0001nL-9Q for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:25:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:25:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uz4Jx-0001nL-9Q@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1Uz4Jo-0001kY-Il for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:25:24 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1Uz4Ji-0001dE-EK for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:25:23 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.218] (ip202-27-218-168.satlan.co.nz [202.27.218.168]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C081BE6EAF; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:24:56 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <51E53B94.4040601@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:24:52 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <51E3F29E.40502@treenet.co.nz> <CABkgnnVGJxpUhth438hzPXdM+QnUU4dHgmA_oKHmyKWyj=ujBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVGJxpUhth438hzPXdM+QnUU4dHgmA_oKHmyKWyj=ujBg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.449, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Uz4Ji-0001dE-EK 00e49504c3a37f96cd4495f57fbe47b3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 : problem with section 3.5 Connection setup magic
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51E53B94.4040601@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18807
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 16/07/2013 4:51 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote: > On 15 July 2013 06:01, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >> I think this particular section 3.5 needs a second explicit note to the >> effect that the opaque blob should be adjusted for the draft-specific >> identifier. > The intent was always the precise opposite here. That magic string > isn't a string, it's just a sequence of octets. It should NOT be > adjusted. > > For one, we don't have any indication that it would be as effective if > it were to be changed. Ah. Thank you. Okay I will code up the HTTP/1.1 agent to expect those exact octets. I still think there should be a second temporary note to clarify that intention for the drafts so long as the section 3.1 special note exists. Amos
- HTTP/2 : problem with section 3.5 Connection setu… Amos Jeffries
- Re: HTTP/2 : problem with section 3.5 Connection … Martin Thomson
- Re: HTTP/2 : problem with section 3.5 Connection … Amos Jeffries