IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Nice

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Fri, 16 August 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E5211E82B7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2OoyDTj9CAXX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFCE11E8186 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1VAOOt-0007hP-V8 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:05:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:05:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1VAOOt-0007hP-V8@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1VAOOi-0007gP-OR for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:05:16 +0000
Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1VAOOh-0004ni-Ia for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:05:16 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id qd12so4058081ieb.28 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+gUhcV1VerrHlsFuUOJPn1xGMhe5IdBgbG2+5IYcdTw=; b=jcNJWumYPRgIieKAxTRUlHgSa0/QRloKnK9LpcweVFRZnKQAYNMI+qzgSaJPMHCsoz XOAyu7EODD1tpfzoQaOheFo1DZn76Hvzh9lIkYzm2xLFwjEDdWiEdZz4lU6uWFhEBTP7 C9u6Zp5t1L6cXaB+iXB3c5k8l5g3gcZESMJFAZGqCAIwrF2L+hFC8IEJH16Ejev/07ik i7QrCAH6EtW1P5e7gDoaP79QHDK8t0R6rDCIXyC3P6ZQWmNBG8ZiMnJLIEb5VZLrLsUW 77Qv5v1lRMhaDgAgOl9Z6XWXqTKOOTWovK7+S4jmMQ8pcVJnM8oi/lJHQf8iahEaHd5d CpFA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+gUhcV1VerrHlsFuUOJPn1xGMhe5IdBgbG2+5IYcdTw=; b=QSRjaR5WXay66TJOL7p+Yk8pij+fpA/anQO+b3penkkNhYh/9ktEkcZfQj8friQ5qX Sshzk9wvDYUQnqZAmSxp7T0nhwLk/KyfLpvPA9zkd7HUzn173OFPFGtxpM1T9RZtkCH+ onVMqOrTqbg13apPASnjtZjCr6SGzSAkksHCo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+gUhcV1VerrHlsFuUOJPn1xGMhe5IdBgbG2+5IYcdTw=; b=hAZbHM9wcODi5T5FKTJ57q6da35ut7T8awKXa+IDPubCtuzQeep3g8HHa7rwI3nGnm iIf5koLBXyG40u/Pd1pkKXAB1c6qNzwHIdxBZyl77aXCculSRSO6lGh1d8xrtqnhoCUL UU3qdgT65r6Uk6bvpnIZqqGBpimE2q+JAvfccx9lTKcFo7RRH3TUN1U8KCJzFqVozDlU +jEyhFeXrZSJIk403JMI0X5sfM8sCVL/iiK+NcbDQzFJ7YaYZ42dnvScwDmKah13fB9C t++1feNIAMkPtNl4VjbJcIpumtAaXbD4syY00VNZGbfRxIAYzBtCv1RAvgGn14kYpS+Q Ex/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlm+P5HGi3xIO4TAY1aX4D2gsKurLpAJCL7tQe4amIjl3yzVuzyDSCEnJTnq6e6yToRv7jGz5jNNvYWlafKWU7yIdN3aTo4tj0t2B2u9lP48jISg2o8PgSEGHGLPVP6kSVqHedQVS/eHLK8Uj8ti1H6542mHHXrA+FYIQba4uZcsiXkBqiGY5132hse+FGuT8xagORm
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.130.106 with SMTP id od10mr182666igb.1.1376676289440; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.231.144.65 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbcOhhLrLp8H0qZ1-DBp85Y=vARYQRPPJRc3wc2hriP-vw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVyfNdDyEgWPO0d66dtrjL_xwu3okGjNTkJ3uqHqh-SbA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbcOhhLrLp8H0qZ1-DBp85Y=vARYQRPPJRc3wc2hriP-vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:04:49 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: gl9rD0Vl9Jw3BByvQIFGEZV-IfE
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYiX4U7oootmNsN9HAPbRcA6Gy-YXcSYg1tOEgmSaN9SnQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b414560346c7104e4146d4a"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.169; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-ie0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.393, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1VAOOh-0004ni-Ia 2f88717c21a2903f61162ab702eba733
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Nice
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYiX4U7oootmNsN9HAPbRcA6Gy-YXcSYg1tOEgmSaN9SnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/19281
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Stream priority is only relative to other streams in a HTTP/2 connection.
The absolute values themselves carry no semantic meaning. They're purely
relative.

This Nice header proposal seems to ascribe semantic meaning to certain nice
values. In that sense, it's very distinct from stream priorities.


On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:57 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> My immediate first response is: how does this overlap with Stream
> priority.. I know this is a separate thing but it would be good to
> make it clear how these intersect.
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Martin Thomson
> <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On a different end of the spectrum that we're used to operating in for
> > HTTP/2.0, this is a small proposal for a header that advises
> > intermediaries about the relative (un)priority of requests.
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http-nice-00
> >
> > This is probably most useful for constrained servers (I've put core on
> BCC).
> >
> > --Martin
> >
> > p.s., The title isn't a value judgement, it's a nod to the unix
> > utility (thanks to Richard Barnes for pointing this out).
> >
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email