IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Nice

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Fri, 16 August 2013 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B991511E817B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.147, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iXHN4nivkz-E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A866D11E817A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1VAOIB-0001Od-Gt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:58:31 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:58:31 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1VAOIB-0001Od-Gt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1VAOI0-0001M1-Qi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:58:20 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.219.42]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1VAOI0-0001fD-2l for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:58:20 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so2649676oag.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jLMpXcusYPANVjKMgaZ97WwYVMTPbsQAtkSoDgKtTFc=; b=UL4WLbrBmGvZJ6UW9hMapftpa2v9EJuIG4S+Z2K9e7FyvftWM3gC5D5OGu5lJ3AVVC SNWcw+G8Iv73SL4TBoXM0io33ahMEZaYz9CH/Mdup84v2462aAJOBTIdbkleS7zwBN38 9MrxxcO4/ZzekveYEpPeuntYZxwkKrQsHQnbFxzG4089/3UI9h6rWs+o8ZXVw08jTRHV NTA/LfmIrZSLz3OL7zojqGDKPORbViNa8Fv75HlYhkKJscMIjYuii1Xlnr/cBAMlp/3v HZRfpgo8gw58EvcwQG5WD4zwN7ovzDreZMdj9uLXd/lojtCq2JBiTETAQguAAXfjDXTq t2nw==
X-Received: by 10.182.27.74 with SMTP id r10mr1549772obg.63.1376675874016; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.124.137 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVyfNdDyEgWPO0d66dtrjL_xwu3okGjNTkJ3uqHqh-SbA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVyfNdDyEgWPO0d66dtrjL_xwu3okGjNTkJ3uqHqh-SbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:57:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbcOhhLrLp8H0qZ1-DBp85Y=vARYQRPPJRc3wc2hriP-vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.42; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f42.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.707, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1VAOI0-0001fD-2l 75209477924bb83f24ecedf5f2e9b00f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Nice
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbcOhhLrLp8H0qZ1-DBp85Y=vARYQRPPJRc3wc2hriP-vw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/19280
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

My immediate first response is: how does this overlap with Stream
priority.. I know this is a separate thing but it would be good to
make it clear how these intersect.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a different end of the spectrum that we're used to operating in for
> HTTP/2.0, this is a small proposal for a header that advises
> intermediaries about the relative (un)priority of requests.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http-nice-00
>
> This is probably most useful for constrained servers (I've put core on BCC).
>
> --Martin
>
> p.s., The title isn't a value judgement, it's a nod to the unix
> utility (thanks to Richard Barnes for pointing this out).
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email