Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 11 October 2016 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3931295C7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FWbVDWixDdbf for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68962129404 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1btpq0-0001tu-UT for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:42:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:42:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1btpq0-0001tu-UT@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1btppx-0001t9-CH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:42:49 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1btppr-0001B7-Nz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:42:48 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69A4D22E1FA; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:42:19 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <147607568231.30483.6721771001967558206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:42:15 +1100
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <273F9B21-F8E9-4E59-8CED-D542B6B5B5A7@mnot.net>
References: <147607568231.30483.6721771001967558206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.247, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1btppr-0001B7-Nz 58c1bf7117ebe99ddc7ad1e0c35824fe
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/273F9B21-F8E9-4E59-8CED-D542B6B5B5A7@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32549
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi everyone,

As Martin indicated before, this is a fairly big change, so let's run a second WGLC on this document, ending 2016-10-25.

Please send feedback to this mailing list and/or the issues list.

Regards,



> On 10 Oct. 2016, at 4:01 pm, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
>        Author          : Martin Thomson
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 19
> 	Date            : 2016-10-09
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo introduces a content coding for HTTP that allows message
>   payloads to be encrypted.
> 
> Note to Readers
> 
>   Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTP working group
>   mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/ .
> 
>   Working Group information can be found at http://httpwg.github.io/ ;
>   source code and issues list for this draft can be found at
>   https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/encryption .
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/