Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Sun, 08 April 2012 20:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D5721F8527 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4xyxV-dfZhZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD35121F84EE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SGyJJ-00078r-Ka for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:02:05 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1SGyJB-00077W-1D for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:01:57 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1SGyJ8-000524-2F for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:01:55 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter-phk.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782075DA8; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q38K1SG4083744; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:01:30 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
cc: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:44:01 +0200." <34f9f0e4f85753187ecbb46f42609f0d.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:01:28 +0000
Message-ID: <83743.1333915288@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1SGyJ8-000524-2F 380cd19e6af0dafeac4953ea43f2ae28
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/83743.1333915288@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13404
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SGyJJ-00078r-Ka@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:02:05 +0000
In message <34f9f0e4f85753187ecbb46f42609f0d.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>, "Nicol as Mailhot" writes: > >Le Dim 8 avril 2012 14:50, Adrien W. de Croy a écrit : > >>>>3. a way to signal the web client a request is being processed (there is no >>>>way a multi-GB iso is going to pass through the anti-malware system >>>>instantaneously, and users will press retry if the download bar does not >>>> move >>>>after a few seconds) > >>>That sounds like serious scope-creep to me. > >Unfortunately a single user that pressed refresh half a dozen times because >he's not seeing progress on its multi-GB file can consume as much in a few >minutes as a normal user would over weeks. Ohh, I don't dispute that. I just don't see the solution being adding a userinterface on top of HTTP... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
- Re[2]: Some proxy needs Adrien W. de Croy
- Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Some proxy needs Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Some proxy needs Mark Nottingham
- Re: Some proxy needs Eliot Lear
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Per Buer
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Per Buer
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Per Buer
- Re: Some proxy needs Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Re[2]: Some proxy needs Roberto Peon
- Re: Some proxy needs Anthony Bryan