RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 17 November 2016 06:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881A51295FC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:42:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VlUpVaVHz3Y5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A7E129650 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c7GL1-0001z4-D1 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:38:23 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:38:23 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c7GL1-0001z4-D1@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c7GKh-0001x9-9G for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:38:03 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c7GKZ-0007oB-9d for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:37:58 +0000
Received: from [31.133.147.187] ([31.133.147.187]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCPhl-1byDtm23bl-0098Gk for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:37:28 +0100
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <b65d5148-29f0-5e8b-9375-590ca8e52357@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:37:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+Daw4BmHj6cBqQYlRgAxBxhgWY09SWUlCuJU2LYFejB4gNsfjpc iyHsR6jpxaSyna2HFe/eAAXrfztwZD8pqdZ6iBw8sT9pFwk7VLUzsMbUFDr3mnprAjYwSVf 3fxxNmlK6uUzBGOOqCanEbIbi2O1SQ2+oNe6osn4+Ok2CkvMnZbFLrxwBo2aEHBflaBcKnU 1tKCaxaCuGzBM0LFpMO8w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:FMPZ6EvdVP4=:ocEEAONasTDLHbF8cTXtN9 hC8K0T43PXQj6q2Dgh2Rln28W+f3e7gAQPJOb6rcHwQHBxIzOycCBeJIQsDTUE8v0/oWnurVa oWYvXfYunn0CbncvoMGIIDWVfeYXX1IjN/Crh/m7s6cy6jadK3VcX37vCqPR8bUD33LuQIemS HJVFlZJxgtlb6kvonZQPqZdbDTi0cu8W98AC3JsxBph8E6wv7he5YzsoD1J0kRdY6bkgw2Wwp kl2XydqgMJ+OwQ9Y9kKwA1jXPJLiI/oDX8qXFI/yyhQrj3skjqeqGcMZiuylQ3qQZfuM/k9u+ o/mhafR8eUUL4TaL5vbGDKUaOxzdmjFF8sTf+ir/dFuJTtW6sFOIYE4rHrtOwGWDb9K63v5k7 IVlHzjhO3ooIiA3ltqweSlZNnW1Yg8hAZZUsNVhE0vBtFSkKto+2tvrsnl2oC13E9YtrtzQFx xGIMsQd5Oly72dcp9cxoM6unIYC+m3pyRMLaYk42+FFym6mFA13Tc0tixP7kyYprOa93D21CL DIeXVkkqrK0FUw/+CP8xVkliFIfdmvZM15kHW8aGI82bRwOLDrtE09Ke06NA3j+Orr3F9pLV6 H/3hMJXWn1Y9+5Sabcm8/MOtPGJyVGiJMpo+8nfj/zHi9aTU6Y3AWYvZTR3UShBB0gB3WQMFn EFLxYZK3japRXdKJNj+Osu4VhLnCHtwdmeoGRnivuZu3dmzAS+LY5CIQ2GKymsyupuaerb2W+ gr8YxOmEjuZXOP3ci6w9yt53Qtaf02oDQdN/ZJx6lHH/q2gOzm3GD9S2beYLKo7zJyr+EnXxo E2P6L96
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c7GKZ-0007oB-9d 6c6a5aa494c9fc4bd721c2226d8241d2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/b65d5148-29f0-5e8b-9375-590ca8e52357@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32916
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hi there, I got some great feedback from one of our chairs who checked how this impacts *his* work on RFC 5988bis (which refers to RFC 5987) -- see <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/267>. One point he makes is that the fact that the parameter encoding doesn't have a proper name (other than "the encoding defined in...") makes it hard to talk about it in other specs. So, given that we're after WGLC: Would people object to naming this thing? This would affect the abstract, the introduction, the title, and maybe some more places. *If* the group is ok with this, would "IPE" (Internationalisation Parameter Encoding") be ok? Best regards, Julian
- RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding Martin J. Dürst
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding Julian Reschke