[Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4472)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 29 September 2015 13:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0256B1B3C8B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgBCMRaz6Ak4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E471B3C87 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZguYq-0003VB-BK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:03:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:03:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZguYq-0003VB-BK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1ZguYi-0003Ty-Px for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:03:04 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1ZguYf-0007QK-7h; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:03:04 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4F579187E4F; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: http@florianbest.de, fielding@gbiv.com, ylafon@w3.org, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20150929130145.4F579187E4F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:01:45 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.181, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZguYf-0007QK-7h f8d8254a639dd193db614dcb4c67c8f5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4472)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150929130145.4F579187E4F@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30284
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7233, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4472 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Florian Best <http@florianbest.de> Date Reported: 2015-09-13 Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- o The first and last bytes only (bytes 0 and 9999): bytes=0-0,-1 Corrected Text -------------- o The first and last bytes only (bytes 0 and 9999): bytes=0-1,-1 Notes ----- If the first byte is requested the offset must be 1. --VERIFIER NOTES-- The reporter has retracted this after more testing, saying that "The sentence 'the byte positions specified are inclusive' seems to explain it," though he thinks it could be explained more clearly and directly. -------------------------------------- RFC7233 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., Y. Lafon, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4472) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4472) Florian Best
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4472) RFC Errata System