Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F3B1294EA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:36:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fk4wDRnhSLu0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7B012007C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c5Tjv-0006hs-HN for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:32:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:32:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c5Tjv-0006hs-HN@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c5Tjq-0006h7-00 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:32:38 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c5Tjj-0003C1-RA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:32:32 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id x190so45921120qkb.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:32:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jrZNiUVyFB9rqLJaR/4FOzecyNrUNGRoiDDpkKW5Q9s=; b=0Rw6/wv5kgob/QY8llHHEhEXeHS62Kn8pxC4DIubsOGXgisQBk5wrp5t03sydiJJZw VHMa1nqlw3vYVkZssTRwlmBZv0j/6uOa1N5BGwp37UcVeE9ZodvxNQntp6yEENEekYOP mO3V9IYa6YwHC8Cch6VPUWGbOH3Ccby9uLZ8Oqytxr610PHMl5mCLq9IljoTYypmyuye MRQwNkU9+fIrftyd1SGkYPFS2Ui0opuYrrpLai5TZDpgTmeayu3GFZJXrq+Ri8TGDfuF xGN+o9/oEnk69S6iZ9pWSWcKX2S/frtOoXfLjiUrrzYnVpxpnYecBa3qgpxUJSZI/stn drEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jrZNiUVyFB9rqLJaR/4FOzecyNrUNGRoiDDpkKW5Q9s=; b=iX0/oHRJjMQpDx9zDN6H7l5JYAu6rzF5PNfBohHwXJzNdZRlmz6YwiyfqmXZKxwLsA nDq1mrWqBV1h3vTczCQSDHfDG3ei1e1I54YVPIBRwNIBTCbUbXug2PyvO0eoHxoFMbw0 I0CxVi4+qE6kbIp7ObipddwVffizq/nAvDoAYa1v/BU7U0bgeMxJuIPuvhy+4yEgJ6w+ x/oQxHchzZZAGoAWWX7/GF3W9Mw1hJMA6HHzlW6OKfYr2Ycvs/foI7TUB4AjkrHhU4fp 7mlK2Xv/1JH/Bi8wCKBTfPORfBr1WNqAcVB8jpqzF+DSEDc6UqLPvd/RR3WO2aXrfN1o WlMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcd5v/LThq3vQ1IUc+q2fGcSMatZUGG8NZJ///8K9Hc2KzVCQ2d9fICyEaQS8ZodluuvTwPL6vJ2rwJOw==
X-Received: by 10.55.74.1 with SMTP id x1mr7890254qka.316.1478939526026; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:32:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:32:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161112081859.A68C013455@welho-filter2.welho.com>
References: <a3f3a4e0-5be3-f619-d2f8-cdda6ce2ed1e@gmx.de> <20161112081859.A68C013455@welho-filter2.welho.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:32:05 +0900
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWgQ1JcK9SpfeLcLdCLrzPCPkWJh-2TZgDoBhe0Fxo24Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.347, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c5Tjj-0003C1-RA 484fdfe8fcf72a1f88412516f2d23091
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWgQ1JcK9SpfeLcLdCLrzPCPkWJh-2TZgDoBhe0Fxo24Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32873
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 12 November 2016 at 17:18, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> If I understand correclty  Eric Rescorla suggest own specification:
>
>         Crypto-Key header field for HTTP Encrypted Content-Encoding
>
>
> Essentially moving
>
> 3.  Crypto-Key Header Field
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04#section-3
>
> to that specification.
>
> Then also there need something to be done with examples.

The alternative is to find a different solution for that draft, like
moving the keys to the payload.