Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 27 February 2013 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AA921F87B9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:56:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.778, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frfIUKbP-nCk for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF35B21F8751 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UAoz2-0003VR-Bp for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:56:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:56:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UAoz2-0003VR-Bp@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1UAoyt-0003SQ-Ey for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:56:07 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1UAoys-0000F3-QQ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:56:07 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.20]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M8LTo-1V5Pvq24Ju-00vyUR for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:55:40 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2013 21:55:40 -0000
Received: from p5DD965C5.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.1.102]) [93.217.101.197] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2013 22:55:40 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/yroIja9PyHr0Eq8nFyNdqBtL5Ujf6yPh0mU8MHa YSRiTi7ruNeZyn
Message-ID: <512E80DA.2020802@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:55:38 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CABP7RbfK9jT=-wXqv8wo6fJr8Wg0g9SYTZ3FeXHC=4yhihdsug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbfK9jT=-wXqv8wo6fJr8Wg0g9SYTZ3FeXHC=4yhihdsug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.269, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UAoys-0000F3-QQ 098eb3859ad0e23e581802573c621897
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/512E80DA.2020802@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16906
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2013-02-27 22:16, James M Snell wrote:
> As I'm not going to be able to meet y'all in Orlando, I wanted to give
> a quick status update on where I'm at with the Header Encoding.
>
> After much experimentation, implementation and discussion with
> Roberto, I've got an implementation that is a good balance between
> Delta and BOHE. It uses the fundamental delta encoding mechanism that
> Roberto created (with a few notable changes) but allows for four
> distinct types of header values: text, numeric, date and raw-binary.
> Every header value is encoded with a single additional byte flag that
> indicates the value type. Further, the flags indicate whether text is
> ISO-8559-1 or UTF-8 and whether it is huffman-coded or not.  This
> scheme gives us a good balance and allows us to achieve maximum
> compression ratios and increased long term functionality without
> sacrificing too much in complexity or backwards compatibility.
>
> Text values:
>
>    The rules for text values are simple:
>
>    1. Text can be either UTF-8 or ISO-8859-1 Encoded. A single bit in
> the flags is used to indicate which it is.

Why can't we stick to UTF-8 for text?

 > ...

Best regards, Julian