Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt

Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6761295C9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:20:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4DrDfPPzo1W for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EED11295E2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:20:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cbcOh-00043r-Tf for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:15:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:15:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cbcOh-00043r-Tf@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1cbcOe-00040t-HJ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:15:36 +0000
Received: from mail-ot0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1cbcOY-00027i-0i for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:15:30 +0000
Received: by mail-ot0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 65so1068048otq.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:15:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=Jbuy87bDYK6xUDAMPELWnCCEPTTAaTlYpjSN/l/XCxA=; b=Pfmmb8pPACntlK69h1J2lZVkBFC019UZIsjcb27+K8br0C0IGunzf04WsZ5xyIUZ9k 9W+GW5hK804fK7aw4vL/HH+zcZv1vonT5W7i8gJREls/LB+uvte8WlVZpFKSoclsuW+8 SMSS8wkRPbiFPlIJDeYNnAPSy7hQmu5gGIqyzrH208c7Bl9MHi4gPDd3DVkspA+HQHyF PXVI/ho5i3dkZdJ/Mwwwn2UXV+udVrCgdlUUbK8TWeigX829dDdH6Nd4/FkIvfKhuQvk hVBH0Wcg3bm4KPrRxP0k0ugikCEZNF4xudPMD3Z/o/VhpbwQRBvCm56rzOlrZKd92764 m5jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=Jbuy87bDYK6xUDAMPELWnCCEPTTAaTlYpjSN/l/XCxA=; b=lIOZiwby2sI5ZIG5cRhTwysqCSgTwW9rm24vNYfjJZPR4rIhoqmKUBZdm20jU1xAtv AZyQew7hZzOT/qcolDSLS1ZKTe/+UFV13do7HnE7CvS/XXsJ+SPYlF5I5rFhTBrD7mFZ XHBe0w7AxLLM+ICYEdR1hgMY9Qhyz28tPpS1R3BGzYDT2nZdVVQsdgs1hPOYa8KV6I1g Cn1d8S9GRcMmkQ3+PZHzBgxtYPYCtOVXZW3Hgfvd+Yd6jTU2YUMS8yMeoYt0PtuIsJIl 1gKD1A/eTDdhwvPi2FOSG0JW8V7PzXvfq9CsoB8j/+nLMxKUF9iBIi7YHCBAMzAzbSIb swUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kobP1JX+D5sWaohhYwBdrn8SJRDhaP/zy4tY14j0MGWsb/mHGojee6VVap5+C7P25/M4nCHR2WzxEXzw==
X-Received: by 10.157.37.99 with SMTP id j32mr169890otd.232.1486599303876; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:15:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.16.113 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:15:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148656041212.3805.9770039700097876577.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148656041212.3805.9770039700097876577.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:15:03 +0900
Message-ID: <CANatvzwjvVbx50kLzPT3z0KNPudD89ogZTiY83xk03hsyD37bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.182; envelope-from=kazuhooku@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.211, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cbcOY-00027i-0i 3ab71cdc59c1cb30fe2c5a0700daddc9
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CANatvzwjvVbx50kLzPT3z0KNPudD89ogZTiY83xk03hsyD37bQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33464
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

I've submitted the first version of the WG draft.

The only textual change from the individual draft is the Security
Considerations.

The section now discusses what may happen when the informational
response is sent to a client that does not handle it correctly, so
that the readers can consider the effect before starting to use the
status code. OTOH the draft does not make recommendations against the
idea of using informational responses in fear of broken clients, since
it is basically the responsibility of the broken clients to fix the
issue.

My understanding is that this stance is in accordance to the
discussion we have had on this mailing list.

Please let me know what you think about the text.


2017-02-08 22:26 GMT+09:00  <internet-drafts@ietf.org>:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : An HTTP Status Code for Indicating Hints
>         Author          : Kazuho Oku
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt
>         Pages           : 5
>         Date            : 2017-02-07
>
> Abstract:
>    This memo introduces an informational status code for HTTP that can
>    be used for indicating hints to help a client start making
>    preparations for processing the final response.
>
> Note to Readers
>
>    Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTP working group
>    mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at
>    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/ .
>
>    Working Group information can be found at https://httpwg.github.io/ ;
>    source code and issues list for this draft can be found at
>    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/early-hints .
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>



-- 
Kazuho Oku