Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt

Emily Stark <estark@google.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC7A1294C8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:59:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ir-aqSaJo5b8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051C1128B37 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cbd2m-0003Ue-HB for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:57:04 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:57:04 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cbd2m-0003Ue-HB@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <estark@google.com>) id 1cbd2e-0003Tt-ID for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:56:56 +0000
Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <estark@google.com>) id 1cbd2Y-0007OS-C6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:56:51 +0000
Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c7so114620923itd.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:56:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VMonrHIDyar/JSiNsqRS442E0sRHWXOD7uuNudkm85A=; b=vDi4gvOaopGvTGNCRLDybozqghWdfRH8SaTuKW8wKdyvNlByeiL5PZcw8Vbkq53cpw NgqafxIILjhCKDA31ih/w6MC2L/mO6XIIx7SLJSdlcXrWQpnRv+pAWE6eKlpiVzBtjTO 0LbUFvSoSODvJfTKIsQr2KRDmHCN3UqjTrqsd6/xJnhUyapoiEdPDjnKPR9aJeSQTujr GRtyLotkskrTBE15KfV3CYGqhKOBc0JNOjhyrpCloeV/EamawIPdTOWSuVpYaKvZcOt3 noS6sVOlC/fEJ4kgG5fZ8UplO7b3kPGfbcwKOq6PlyYTSdT7D2iQJoQr0TZOOuhcTam5 vtAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VMonrHIDyar/JSiNsqRS442E0sRHWXOD7uuNudkm85A=; b=EF3g6xB9+Sbr8FiBDE8tdWSH8y3xDFtFPXJSlQlQa9IDBfkgKMhFTM0mp2RGF6GKth ZfqUKGIFxH66pNoQC3maOP+rb2hnM9MGBciLwp4OHBFQ5PtPcKPLO+uZAre6Wt86MVZc 2Rxb/pdIPMASjxiNrdtN6ar1isAXbEcqc2yeJ+MRYe16Q+I6ZAtCcke5JX8iofbUfh02 jL+OC3PqUkVEY1b5u2EeoUJXGux8XbHmt5iNZRL+e+0+Xc2BiIGOHHUww3YPerQySx0e +6i/CZOKMmTGUGUoorTUsADrHzyTFuCXTMFeOhODgy3N6wP9LDXO+2hzZFQwI2mtu4Az vx/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n3zVVL3tNGDEY2MFUte2Vf+gTTFphO4WwyoNnRWQu8ELMwyVeEkZTMJ6UOiOUa3O2PJqyjuDiUV5/Q2rga
X-Received: by 10.36.7.5 with SMTP id f5mr969860itf.33.1486601784044; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:56:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.169.22 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:56:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170208210337.GA17727@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <148658107138.4399.11763960496527846649.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170208210337.GA17727@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
From: Emily Stark <estark@google.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:56:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPP_2SbXkW9YgcHzxd2yrmWXYPo=qS1xHcwF+RVHei__nkpP=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Cc: httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11440d8e42f59a05480e73c2"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.54; envelope-from=estark@google.com; helo=mail-it0-f54.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.713, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cbd2Y-0007OS-C6 4618c6184406dcc689934a0c0468195f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPP_2SbXkW9YgcHzxd2yrmWXYPo=qS1xHcwF+RVHei__nkpP=w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33465
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:11:11AM -0800, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol of the IETF.
> >
> >         Title           : Expect-CT Extension for HTTP
> >         Author          : Emily Stark
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt
> >       Pages           : 17
> >       Date            : 2017-02-08
>
> Quick comments:
>
> - Document contains refences [4] and [5], but there are only two numbered
>   references (I presume these should be [1] and [2]).
> - Could be useful to note why trying to embed this information to
>   certificate would lead to deployment problems (CAs don't issue TLS
>   feature 18 certificates nor certificates with new extensions).
>

Thanks. Addressed in
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/55b43a0ab49f7c2232ea059b516abc1c749820e4
and
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/41b501407f12a17c657e51727539bfdf1a09b9fe


>
>
> -Ilari
>
>