IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 19 February 2013 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB02421E80A2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:23:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6fh7MDI77OS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE2E21E8087 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U7dnC-0003U5-2Z for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U7dnC-0003U5-2Z@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1U7dn4-0003TM-1k for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:46 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1U7dn2-0001rX-V3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:45 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.197.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B900C509B9; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:22:22 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5122EF7A.7010106@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:22:18 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A7128A0-A238-44AF-B8C3-77A1D3AC5A49@mnot.net>
References: <059.899f26584f4d3bcf9c2e10cc6a352131@trac.tools.ietf.org> <074.21ca6668fa864c2f4bdc9f51674f97ca@trac.tools.ietf.org> <DEAF35DB-1788-4463-B842-36684EFD9307@mnot.net> <BCE86C06-37A4-4B69-B81E-AF29D2543453@gbiv.com> <0BE829B6-48AE-470A-8F79-00E8363DF074@mnot.net> <25710780-FE28-45B8-8452-38F461342320@gbiv.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1301301334410.28219@egate.xpasc.com> <240CA5BF-CBCF-4F6C-9FE0-375B8630ED2E@gbiv.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1301301904250.31030@egate.xpasc.com> <86073E4A-C4F7-4033-B5B0-803C570DB4C0@gbiv.com> <37BEE4A8-AE9B-4F2F-BA7D-D0452D4FC402@gbiv.com> <5114C6EA.7030701@treenet.co.nz> <E4F73CB4-1F2B-430F-A566-E9E6F4AEE0D8@mnot.net> <5122EF7A.7010106@treenet.co.nz>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.324, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U7dn2-0001rX-V3 94316640a656ab80761c9d3bda6a104a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/3A7128A0-A238-44AF-B8C3-77A1D3AC5A49@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16670
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 19/02/2013, at 2:20 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 18/02/2013 1:04 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Right, and those cases are made clear here:
>> 
>> https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.html#response.cacheability
>> 
>> Closing as incorporated.
>> 
> 
> one more difficult case is present...
> 
> How to interpret Cache-Control:private,private="foo"
> 
> For now we are going to interpret it as Cache-Control:private in Squid.

I think that is the correct interpretation; 'private' without an argument appears in the response, therefore it can't be stored by a shared cache.

Cheers,




--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email