IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Tue, 19 April 2016 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0604812DA74 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ik-d5rTH_cqq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90FCA12D9F9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1asWqb-0005M9-C5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:41:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:41:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1asWqb-0005M9-C5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1asWqX-0005Kn-VQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:41:46 +0000
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1asWqW-0004D2-1T for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:41:45 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u3JEf1cf008548; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:41:01 +0200
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:41:01 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20160419144101.GC8496@1wt.eu>
References: <20160413160504.63AB6180006@rfc-editor.org> <BC8FFB7E-CAC0-4BA2-958D-6256B20AA2F0@mnot.net> <57163F29.1000505@measurement-factory.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57163F29.1000505@measurement-factory.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.925, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1asWqW-0004D2-1T aca1da6302e2e978634f1da4bebe46b7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20160419144101.GC8496@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31505
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:22:33AM -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 12:18 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > I *think* we've come to a place where there's agreement on accepting the errata, but with BWS replacing OWS throughout; i.e.:
> > 
> > chunk-ext      = *( BWS  ";" BWS chunk-ext-name [ BWS  "=" BWS chunk-ext-val ] )
> > 
> > Everyone OK with that?
> 
> FWIW, I am OK with that "better BWS than nothing" solution.

And I'm OK as well.

Cheers,
Willy

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email