Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI
Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Wed, 10 August 2016 16:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB7312D80B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4GLWNCeBjCG0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB77612D7B4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bXWBs-0005K3-GM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:17:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:17:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bXWBs-0005K3-GM@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>) id 1bXWBk-0005JM-Tk for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:17:04 +0000
Received: from mail.measurement-factory.com ([104.237.131.42]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>) id 1bXWBi-0001QM-WC for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:17:04 +0000
Received: from [65.102.233.169] (unknown [65.102.233.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.measurement-factory.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0015EE06C; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
References: <63CCB07A-0204-4CF7-B598-9497D7112021@lukasa.co.uk> <4314.1470384112@critter.freebsd.dk> <B4171FD2-B154-4950-BF0C-4B5A4714367F@lukasa.co.uk> <57A4B820.9060300@measurement-factory.com> <44E9A3E7-C2CC-46EE-B198-A2E85273B032@lukasa.co.uk> <5221cf24-e49d-9748-d13c-abe02406beac@measurement-factory.com> <4CC78A66-5617-46D0-AC91-6D2FB7E39332@lukasa.co.uk> <103e0083-1046-f429-a1d1-0d0b384ede60@measurement-factory.com> <418145C6-B3DE-4EC8-A069-03A3F210CAF2@lukasa.co.uk>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Message-ID: <a4c30959-daff-9395-0be3-07d44249be73@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:16:36 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <418145C6-B3DE-4EC8-A069-03A3F210CAF2@lukasa.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.237.131.42; envelope-from=rousskov@measurement-factory.com; helo=mail.measurement-factory.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.274, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.451, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bXWBi-0001QM-WC 4934291b1d2a8d0fb3e3072af75d7d58
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/a4c30959-daff-9395-0be3-07d44249be73@measurement-factory.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32246
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 08/10/2016 03:50 AM, Cory Benfield wrote: > using Max-Forwards is conditional on not dumping > HPACK. That may be an acceptable compromise. What is wrong with receiving HPACK state from hop #(N+1) that has allowed its HPACK state sharing, even if you actually asked to see HPACK state of the unsupporting hop #N? I understand that #(N+1) may not be very useful in some triage cases, but I am sure it will be useful in others. The Via headers and/or equivalent will tell the client which hop responded to the Max-Forwards:N debugging request (and, in most cases, whether any unsupporting hops were skipped). Alex.
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Alex Rousskov
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Poul-Henning Kamp
- RE: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Mike Bishop
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Alex Rousskov
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Alex Rousskov
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Alex Rousskov
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Alex Rousskov
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Stefan Eissing
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Martin Thomson
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Alcides Viamontes E
- Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI Stefan Eissing
- H2 Implementation Debug State URI Cory Benfield