Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT)
Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Fri, 04 March 2016 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505951A0383 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:35:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1aNkqXNFSyv for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE4F1A0382 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1abscf-0004Vp-5f for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:30:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:30:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1abscf-0004Vp-5f@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mcmanus@ducksong.com>) id 1abscX-0004Hw-8e for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:30:29 +0000
Received: from www.ducksong.com ([192.155.95.102] helo=linode64.ducksong.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mcmanus@ducksong.com>) id 1abscV-0005BT-Iq for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:30:28 +0000
Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com (mail-vk0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC4893A080 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:30:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e6so58829063vkh.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 08:30:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKCbd/HGWbHmp2r05CjEEWjMBEESOfbAida9WCsoYZLFyWGFuYn9kEoaK/AMPdbhRnTHBZfmv1sqmRXRA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.141.10 with SMTP id p10mr7270368vkd.93.1457109005418; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 08:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.176.64.72 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:30:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56D992E5.9070406@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20160301122415.25221.56881.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAC27A79-D409-4665-A9AA-BA362B99B425@mnot.net> <56D992E5.9070406@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:30:05 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrpDzWYjEqon3ohuij9SwW+evEDOvsN=_SYQT0HRKf+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrpDzWYjEqon3ohuij9SwW+evEDOvsN=_SYQT0HRKf+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Mike Bishop <michael.bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11425f50aacf0a052d3ba0b6"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.155.95.102; envelope-from=mcmanus@ducksong.com; helo=linode64.ducksong.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.705, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1abscV-0005BT-Iq e9e7539cf5aa31e9f88729ddcb620a0b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNrpDzWYjEqon3ohuij9SwW+evEDOvsN=_SYQT0HRKf+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31178
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > That said, the probability of having an effective replay cache > in place is probably quite small for any significantly sized > site, so this isn't likely a major deal. Could still be worth > noting though, as I'd say it'd be non-obvious for people deploying. > > I think the right place to document this would be alongside the documentation of the replay cache mitigation.. as far as I understand that, the issue is that the cache is a physical resource and any kind of load balancing (l4, DNS A records, or alt-svc) is going to limit its efficacy.
- Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-http… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Patrick McManus
- Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Erik Nygren
- Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Martin Thomson