Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous header?
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Mon, 18 March 2024 16:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1813AC19330B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="BBCJbUUm"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="b7+TCYiR"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.b="GkwcUpT1"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dY0b_l4Cy-vb for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF54C18DBAD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Subject:Content-Type:Cc:To:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To; bh=EPLlbn7arkSUxIQi5DwJHX8Q2MG8HVnRAx6oKJ7iPOo=; b=BBCJbUUm7s8hQR4741cK6RKCyr x5B8TUY9Ecsc46EG3ZWBcv59W4KRbGoFv5aGU5kWQ6GbXahYLnqaT+CqbQnhcJ6eXHkevNQj+5Qnh PZxGtuzfWxlPsI96KSMHmcfb4EoSfaZhxIbqN76KR5PwWjNa1fCsguQ8f4ji9hgmK/CvGWR9oWQei lh3nGbxdCoZ5RutaC26v6A/dkEsdoVTwl9ruMJSsHkqHVdemau95jXtncbhDUYBLXXy4I2k3SpWoL XSniwXJi7iShj+qRx4jNsIaIx1mrh6KC/vhCrmVyBYnnBVVeM4pksu/RVVpE3y4bPA9i1IpsG04uF OblEGw3Q==;
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1rmFTv-00HIMx-4H for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:04:59 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:04:59 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1rmFTv-00HIMx-4H@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from puck.w3.org ([34.196.82.207]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <watsonbladd@gmail.com>) id 1rmFTr-00HILv-Sj for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:04:55 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To; bh=EPLlbn7arkSUxIQi5DwJHX8Q2MG8HVnRAx6oKJ7iPOo=; t=1710777895; x=1711641895; b=b7+TCYiRvQPbGdgY1evbqpcNNPNLk4uA7xcyGbH5scHMzA2a7edaLEFMBf8dt+lj9CI7icZE6ER wPTu6G4SX3usSmkNz8vXozpDkQlPG8OIZEhrGd1YvWkE4rJR2OzStpdAqkUihO9eRJP1c+LG8tjIO j2Z2i07NMKV6JTzWfW8uMP88ar15P9ucWr8eEo83hepFChy5T7DYiCenvI4xIBycSz4m72YrGgV/6 rsaNhbDTGke6cxMKPg64zLMDGaOXPfS3oOFqDEOolnYftXjw7LnlFwUWQrNcT94ZPa2kDCqoS1HAW LXN4WY4OPZ5QcyYKUoxzADWrmd3SjpPj8qyg==;
Received-SPF: pass (puck.w3.org: domain of gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::433 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::433; envelope-from=watsonbladd@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x433.google.com;
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by puck.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <watsonbladd@gmail.com>) id 1rmFTr-009IH7-0Y for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:04:55 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33ed4dd8659so1648631f8f.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710777891; x=1711382691; darn=w3.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EPLlbn7arkSUxIQi5DwJHX8Q2MG8HVnRAx6oKJ7iPOo=; b=GkwcUpT1zWWXCm6bUY4JE82H00rW2sA8E9YTd/NQMpDELvzwcnnlRTpnpqnKl9XVDV N/a06QYVnRC9AGeMGa+MM2P+wp0vZ0Mo4im4CFyZxhI4YojkS5WKnsqa5WrdPula34jS pxkO80RBiVU7U3yISJQ1i1tcpNjTsHaGjTUEjYsgygRfPGuaCNBgGu4cdG7NXlZeK+xG Vz9s0OfPpsYd4BxXG9GwM0Veubo1RjFIg/wv1m8C98SJWh+7ap8PNZ63jmNntLxwDr9P LCK4LLBluFSPv1odf/krl3F54jSmPRWNJ8noBEQYZVPFI7vH6iLHlJQfiItGOGO2Rtqu i2sA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710777891; x=1711382691; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=EPLlbn7arkSUxIQi5DwJHX8Q2MG8HVnRAx6oKJ7iPOo=; b=DD6jREplwDi/jQxhi24MsLfYR0uv+A7R34iGbdW1JsxX/AGvBW+UvfEGymRIvyIvWi WbIXaA1YDmVcjHD87PnsYOx/gRq/xqP+8TVEo/sykx1gyLIH+ma0rmCwmOfN1bKG585A Kxg1ohIS2TNYWqNO/aivv9p3JweJK3S8rfCgPurr8QSNTD5kdoq3Ja/43Os/nz9xn9oi w/BgsOghCbVy0nNNc8TWol70F2KdiLyHa3we/wIdl00VsA+oDI3Y5dtDM55+7MkBtrBT X90LjS6jI1NzYbAIpN8AOUujTBEL0HwgB7jYvZBtfP4kclbkMKW4lG654ZIDiMJn0XsA vC4A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCURZCkyF2hLUzU/LMXITKSv8kl/97e2Vht2OPTK1pPX8g714V8ozHoEetK5ZbVWiroPQ+2ifZ4Q+XpVZsh47WlRp8/j
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzti578l5JjhZuEQQoablfnCbCniEIYKLmMRDKfgC+vJS8kNyYT zREkHFvPNh169tpQwMtbSuvdro5mpPIG6K/fnbmbTJkKuOO9sjVLWyhyER+xO5dgkI72H2QYf1c me6r2GRK4xntKIDN/IUpxw8Db+eo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEp5Io/HTUFGwnCgZs8RXgcDRZhgT0+B6HJqDZKPHZIzLVAyfXiYH+c1jh8zJv1qnenqJHR5b5XkkVZxAQpd38=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:66d2:0:b0:33e:b7d4:892f with SMTP id k18-20020a5d66d2000000b0033eb7d4892fmr39153wrw.20.1710777890961; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cac456fe-6385-4afb-913e-e730f68439d8@gmail.com> <8715d343-a547-49f0-857c-459bad7a4844@evertpot.com> <CA+-cKyPC+LTG7UC3QMtw6wtJf+sM_NzUcbfBqLA3vXkhyLBWXw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+-cKyPC+LTG7UC3QMtw6wtJf+sM_NzUcbfBqLA3vXkhyLBWXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:04:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=vQQd7qarVJZWhCAiWgqD_vTcjM-x04dw2aKMZG_JpMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Soni L." <fakedme+http@gmail.com>
Cc: Evert Pot <me@evertpot.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=watsonbladd@gmail.com domain=gmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: puck.w3.org 1rmFTr-009IH7-0Y ccfb760af66aa1fe23ad800ccf671274
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous header?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CACsn0c=vQQd7qarVJZWhCAiWgqD_vTcjM-x04dw2aKMZG_JpMA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/51897
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/email/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Accept header contains a list of formats, and the server picks. Nothing breaks from adding the hint the client would like something else. Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
- could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous header? Soni L.
- Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous head… Soni L.
- Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous head… Soni L.
- Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous head… Evert Pot
- Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous head… Soni L.
- Re: could we have some sort of Is-Autonomous head… Watson Ladd