COPY: "Duplicate" functionality

Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm> Mon, 31 October 2016 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C2A129988 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7aXCuR8s7M-6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D351C129978 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1Gj2-00026f-99 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:50:24 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:50:24 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1Gj2-00026f-99@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <minfrin@sharp.fm>) id 1c1Gix-000257-ND for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:50:19 +0000
Received: from monica.sharp.fm ([80.168.143.5]) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <minfrin@sharp.fm>) id 1c1Gir-00045q-Iu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:50:14 +0000
Received: from [10.105.12.70] (unknown [5.56.169.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: minfrin@sharp.fm) by monica.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 309F1832AD for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:49:51 +0000 (GMT)
From: Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FEBF8153-459E-44F4-BE08-81551FAD4015"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Message-Id: <9104F1BF-CA99-4640-A350-EDE4D9290C84@sharp.fm>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:49:49 +0200
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.168.143.5; envelope-from=minfrin@sharp.fm; helo=monica.sharp.fm
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.505, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c1Gir-00045q-Iu eb1dfd7beb08692b30886df9783d55bc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9104F1BF-CA99-4640-A350-EDE4D9290C84@sharp.fm>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32754
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi all,

According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4918#section-9.8, the COPY method allows me to make a copy of a resource, but only as long as I know the destination URL of my copy: "The Destination header MUST be present.”.

What I need to implement is functionality that matches the “Duplicate” menu item in the MacOS Finder. In other words, I want to make a copy of an URL, but I want the server to decide on the URL to the COPY.

Is this possible while at the same time being RFC compliant?

If I was to set the Destination header to the same URL as the source, or perhaps the parent collection of the source, would that make sense?

Regards,
Graham
—