Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt

Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9821294D7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLhhOekcMgd9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66C9129407 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1DXQ-00021Q-3X for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:26:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:26:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1DXQ-00021Q-3X@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1c1DXI-0001y1-Ff for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:26:04 +0000
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1c1DXC-0001nr-8V for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:25:59 +0000
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t196so18114956lff.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HARnQTt+xsSgyCbu9L/G4HK9wpVATnIkrBwaInqKJfM=; b=PbIuqeNOhmSBUhf946cP0xnk3TFXw+E9M/R/DZ7qUJS8BDNpcmkGqsEZ6Vdclbr2I/ kPwbqwnh9TnX5+OilDCdJEMSTuvyLctOPygN1UPIQvF99XU00cta9vgXwxIRfktESYZ5 kxRqsZk072mV07H/c4dhPT+dD0Uw5hF3rOwE2aGoDNTTD6XE5yG6PKCVl4oWn3Cy6Y// zN5FIpks2K9popoJCXcpRTMxU+UqsFaF8KOIZD8YlW6WV+uH8M96VVdQST6+cX8mIYA4 BxDCo4OdXf1wCEztDM+Zmo2wTcbFAyisYhOpJRiIb/XKOBu+QDQL+fQqzIkvL0ARF5pU Nx3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=HARnQTt+xsSgyCbu9L/G4HK9wpVATnIkrBwaInqKJfM=; b=GxZI3zmu5/lpWwcjikO4lHoPpK54i04jGQvEjWOZ5r7TyibZFS2JZ91a46Tkox3bL7 mTgXhGljUaWINODQRswXqXZXotAOGfhrkqpDhOM4Ataa5k3UP44GWdno95S5ydXse32P pLUz8rZ3W0X4F5NJI9dUF+io0xdmp3THMNL11XcHMv4aI52qGCt3PEyS4nRb8BeRcqpm XattbKiV2eLkGPSYHR+dM1M7SMvf/TS5Ki1eK6Xvqk1zYXVjYasMwbbc8n5BEcDBuCJA dVhyeDaj9tnGKpiKTJ1t4n0wV9eS9IGBD9D0x6rPXZvW47FWi1OkLPM3NBw/+XicnZKv b1AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc5dXQCxmU8QZOmVm3/3WuzDDmdLoPEBfbFfs1cE8O/NclGChkKh2SKpN5fGB7WgIhegEkHSys8mBEqBw==
X-Received: by 10.194.172.100 with SMTP id bb4mr5359359wjc.53.1477923931220; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.163.69 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <147792294052.32397.15544665152412530374.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147792294052.32397.15544665152412530374.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:25:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CANatvzwm_T-HW0yT1MAWEUrfw5OAVkmAZe890575qg8HuU9Z_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.51; envelope-from=kazuhooku@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf0-f51.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.158, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c1DXC-0001nr-8V 99b76502ff47e9fd02e08d8873355284
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CANatvzwm_T-HW0yT1MAWEUrfw5OAVkmAZe890575qg8HuU9Z_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32751
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

I've just posted a new I-D named "An HTTP Status Code for Indicating Hints".

The draft can be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code/
A prettified editor's copy can be found at https://kazuho.github.io/early-hints/

The draft proposes a new _informational_ status code that can be used
for indicating hints to help a client start making preparations for
processing the final response, while the server struggles to build the
final response.

Actually, we already have a working implementation. H2O, our HTTP/2
server, recognizes Link: rel=preload headers within an informational
response sent from upstream, and tries to push the specified resource.
One reason I decided to write this draft is because I believe it would
be better to standardize the mechanism.

But I also believe that having support for this status code within the
web browsers is beneficial as well.

For example, the proposed status code can be used by edge servers to
notify the client the existence of third-party resources while the
request is processed by an upstream server. It can also be used as an
alternative to H2 push on a bandwidth-constrained network.

In short, I consider the proposed method as a good complement to H2 push.

Please let me know what you think. Thank you in advance.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: 2016-10-31 23:09 GMT+09:00
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Kazuho Oku and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code
Revision:       00
Title:          An HTTP Status Code for Indicating Hints
Document date:  2016-10-31
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          4
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00


Abstract:
   This memo introduces an informational status code for HTTP that can
   be used for indicating hints to help a client start making
   preparations for processing the final response.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat



-- 
Kazuho Oku