IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 12 November 2016 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADBE1299D4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:36:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kYjwnAOBFBLN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F0B1299C7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c5SpY-0003yL-OD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:34:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:34:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c5SpY-0003yL-OD@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c5SpU-0003xU-3F for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:34:24 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c5SpO-000099-Ah for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:34:18 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.126.213]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJBRC-1c77mJ1YR0-002owz; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:33:49 +0100
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <147792294052.32397.15544665152412530374.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANatvzwm_T-HW0yT1MAWEUrfw5OAVkmAZe890575qg8HuU9Z_Q@mail.gmail.com> <86447165-100C-407D-8512-A32F93B11BBA@lukasa.co.uk> <c7b33b3d-8cab-5621-2c74-14e21a5a3885@gmx.de> <4178648b-081f-6a85-ce06-2037c946993c@gmx.de> <5aea6698-ec53-f670-63a7-69e13f3d9a60@gmx.de> <a4cbb6f0-caa8-8adc-47dd-115d74deedd3@measurement-factory.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <f4bb96dc-502f-0d98-4672-2ad394d61036@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:33:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a4cbb6f0-caa8-8adc-47dd-115d74deedd3@measurement-factory.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UWf+M1favahvrxsXT+6xmeLVqvaU2qCo7bGhj/35SEaouFUT4tS 2hoywQZEaKhmOjOK2PRVpTappPgIdQ/msbQWNPjyFo0ogpeKH5uQOxN9Nx3NNhn1024Bl6Q xNO0cA5ZuFtlIvngxEy306BkAOsXGxPq+BRU9qKI7x7Aipt7xheBWwFh+u7jVIQl9M67tr7 631QAhPEdxA2/lMKccUSA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:jjWWrAykwIc=:xIG/F6MTRu4Gb4cUsHWr4L XD2sVk4zoo6wNyBvqhlN2+AM6VcFVMiAr8AOCv2huCmi8y1q8pBOTlJfn848rQpUbWCQDCfnM TU0Ga0c/Or/oitinI4lwHMhwsz3IM4DU7zE9ZEVuCUIxmThLLGgv33vAZVABkrlIqqy+1Z73k s4WyHrIKdQiWztTZPy20NL42yYQv5WFPbse7MWLRTqOZb2YK4+bKuJK2sEgVW7E/HhSf6bcPu e0VaP8p5pda3mm8cRpsB4YopjzbsYsfbu56JX7LEgQMdexnS+LrFRbTvRv7Wy/iPiaF/6niq9 fq8WmsPJ9+oEWs6amV6aI/D02acqn9ddBIl2b0fTNyrwVk5gElxAscj7qFby1yP1732/eFLGB ncUrubKSimgjVPwnlJsg2kIo1hV8xc0zpgPVEoxXEnqH+zUbkqkDQSkOdukAV5pR+/VtpJdau 5F9aeYNMxQj7mUZlg8KMwW2kquGxncX6sjIrOdH7bXxeeP8z7D1w2xwaRIwDmIah1LzbTsjTo l+W4CJMnkeBQlIaDurJ/AUgDdSQga2AbTnPjqm0wJP+iqrkGC/7dJas2q9SCXFI0Gq26XED3o ZIVUOy6TAkv11XF2zbGfejdufcsMSxytVuLBy2jedMw+rWnB8iRuMv3IfJAcEfxBlYv+pdlaY CepBKPKa0tMgFiuo4D5gEOferwS58phJp3LHSPYKMTpHMHtmGwWKQ6js3m3zuhDWN5VElAwkU UbBwk7YuF8kK3fUJj9ceLwM7LymO7BK29RvRRw9Ym0SnPuyQrXs0rYPLZeIzNlnhmwKZ8eRiB +X7qy9D
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.346, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.797, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c5SpO-000099-Ah 5c6b119313a12390a2c1201de9b4de6d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/f4bb96dc-502f-0d98-4672-2ad394d61036@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32869
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-11-12 01:00, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 12:49 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Q: maybe we should create a Wiki page, summarizing implementation status
>> and bug reports?
>
> FWIW, based on the results I had access to, most of the HTTP proxies
> using our HTTP compliance test suite mishandled 1xx messages one way or
> the other. Even today, after all the tests and bug fixes, there is an
> outstanding Squid bug where an unfortunate timing of 1xx and other
> events lead to a crash. 1xx is evidently tricky to get right.
>
> This data point is not meant to support or combat the "let the bad
> implementations surface/suffer" argument. I am just reporting that many,
> possibly most proxies mishandle 1xx messages.

Thanks for the feedback.

When you talk about "timing", does that apply to any 1xx, or just the 
100-continue dance?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email