Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Fri, 15 July 2011 13:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101EA21F8752 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eE6aApXozL3Q for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C8021F865F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Qhiao-0004PY-JK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:38:10 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1Qhiaf-0004Ok-LM for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:38:01 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1Qhiaa-000884-Tk for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:38:01 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6FDbUpa027721; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:37:30 +0200
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:37:30 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110715133730.GB27520@1wt.eu>
References: <FE504DA6-4D3A-4EAC-9416-4C28B832312A@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FE504DA6-4D3A-4EAC-9416-4C28B832312A@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Qhiaa-000884-Tk 3eaefce84721735b87ae983ef13a4fa1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20110715133730.GB27520@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/10947
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Qhiao-0004PY-JK@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:38:10 +0000
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:19:21PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Anyone object to stating that Content-Range has no meaning on responses that aren't 206's? > > Right now we don't say that, and it causes problems; see > http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=45116 I agree that such issues could be avoided by a minor clarification. Willy
- Content-Range on responses other than 206 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Willy Tarreau
- #301: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Yves Lafon
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 Julian Reschke
- Content-Range on responses other than 206 Yves Lafon