IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key

Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> Tue, 06 October 2015 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511FD1B3119 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2MyHNp4f6C7L for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ED01B3116 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZjMAF-00015x-93 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:55:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:55:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZjMAF-00015x-93@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <yoav@yoav.ws>) id 1ZjMAB-00015G-EW for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:55:51 +0000
Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <yoav@yoav.ws>) id 1ZjMA8-0008NQ-KN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:55:50 +0000
Received: by oiww128 with SMTP id w128so103782973oiw.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=I75mrf0WKS7KA3xnspv6PGhpJsieVIS/bs7/B7intHU=; b=QLbW8iVsv2Z03g1vNJ44Pm1YE8r8IQ/HihxOBBN1Ewm6nRm1y/aUxV2j5AFV2rVQVI leIu+fIZZb6t4cFcoUD0HF9y0GulJyp0fu0a75EFJji3YEnWN8vyD5UHfcSM9u+os5pV sOh7yQcm3XBFVjUyaMNlstD242m2I3J5M+qUgFEaaeKa1Henv1U0DyLhGcvH/exH9Oey AT9q/xqs6IGh7aHVXD0DJB55grL9nRI/m8EykQfueQw3E8CJ02zqr1D2cup50qFNHTtD E9hxcbHzhC7z3ZND9+yaV0c57Cs7SaSl7kDGglIDnkMeH98mygxcR2MTxS43r2dHTTTD t/gA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdg/Z5e6IGbI3hDIB0h8qByOM8/uXf85c6XPagqWvH5DKeDuNynQIEACofQz0hKO6gMrhw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.88.215 with SMTP id m206mr18845495oib.47.1444114521956; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.52.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [78.245.148.181]
In-Reply-To: <EFF24778-0AF9-40AF-AB08-85367FEB527A@mnot.net>
References: <EFF24778-0AF9-40AF-AB08-85367FEB527A@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:55:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CACj=BEiy0EjVnJR+Lmg=EkgyWWaceFWRUwrqxQk5qAdPy=cubg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d31c218c08605216a1ddb"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.48; envelope-from=yoav@yoav.ws; helo=mail-oi0-f48.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.716, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZjMA8-0008NQ-KN e70920a9bdf3f896d56b690c7991bd98
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACj=BEiy0EjVnJR+Lmg=EkgyWWaceFWRUwrqxQk5qAdPy=cubg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30327
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I support adoption.

`Key` would be very helpful for Client-Hints and for content negotiation
and adaptation in general, enabling origins and CDNs to adapt the content
to the user's situation (as reflected in Client-Hints or in similar headers
added by Service Workers) while maintaining its cachability in the
browser's cache and in supporting intermediaries (while maintaining a
`Vary` based fallback for non-supporting caches).

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> We discussed this document in Dallas:
>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fielding-http-key>
> ... as well as on and off since then.
>
> Based on the feedback received and after discussion with our Area
> Director, I believe that we should adopt this document as a WG product,
> with a target of Proposed Standard.
>
> Since I'm an author on the document, I've asked Martin Thomson to be
> Document Shepherd, to help judge consensus both of the CfA and during the
> document's LC, should we adopt it. He has graciously agreed.
>
> Please comment on-list; we’ll make a decision about adoption at the end of
> next week. The result of this CfA will also help us determine how to go
> forward with the Client Hints document.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email