IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Headers for HTTP

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 04 March 2020 05:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B1E3A0E90 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 21:15:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=bhxfh2sm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=T3MySq1I
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qK3BTyJgO3_d for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 21:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339303A0E8F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 21:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1j9MKS-0002uJ-Dy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:12:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:12:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1j9MKS-0002uJ-Dy@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1j9MKN-0002so-9P for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:12:15 +0000
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1j9MKL-0000vU-Mh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:12:15 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32F321C57; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:11:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:11:59 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=9 /2xu+Uz+izReIpB8Ym917Zc9JxFz90irth2S17MJS4=; b=bhxfh2sm5ny5L3Sed 3OFu3WqaojK+bWv2EbVRyL3Li2IkSSHf1j2KriPURLetNMRsn7tu5A94pnznc5Mc 90JgaZn87TtQ4V7pBCDUtLwfedpatp0l3JcLkjEYBehSFmPwXSDyCkem+fvm1obS uyazzWO6X4q//ZFqzsYSscC28oWV7sSULnbfeyDlvQ9mOmIiEfAY/BOVFqqlh/uF E8DF0rDK3QaC3ntVs8nDXr/K5CbXdWBoQs9t6Q/DZwCqHxLMOtExaQJt++2buK9n gX/rV7ebcKFKKV3fQAd3/kqU/953QDwb/nSSE4DsvEFPrQ0Yg4yAGNF1KwmHzLeV UVc0Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=9/2xu+Uz+izReIpB8Ym917Zc9JxFz90irth2S17MJ S4=; b=T3MySq1IGqLqhN1MpywBp6dwI0cOuzZ8ibMlDckzU9c9SzDDr1QflDLQH vYnPXo1rxAfFhztkx2cKqf4FnDzhaaIndX2sS2M2x5xZMThRDdwowzsHOy9kCXjf f/XtZpS6AwpjoDkcjeTrRuf/wsedeiZYY1Q7z3oozDGn4KSYt9Xb9LFijVkzbIaP QhvPNWHZgLMtJkqgax6/hCW29ttqf85MNOz3hxQGD/TTq7BzVzcibPQXPW9XZbHl msNUEG/9Qo2x7WDNB9hyHV05zKxSdw+B56UHhHeF0A0ji5hjODJAJk1f97Orw2lb 2J8UbdgISzWpDPm32QuUxsw5Cr+cw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:njhfXuAnp1O-9pFaSEVwFACpBPGw-Js8EGYdVhC1PDzIPTVKqFM2lg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddtjedgkedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinh epghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheek rddvhedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:njhfXkz9BUkaxfztnkLPvWh70HL_g7Gk7xwPvplGWll0lqYheDXgYQ> <xmx:njhfXh6vWAeEQNtgriuL7MVQajdSyJrdQFbC0-MyuodVHPBPuWMjEA> <xmx:njhfXqub3bk7lvENGzemFco7F9dsUFrYbxC6yYJvBE3K7ygBcx8Vrw> <xmx:nzhfXv3qy-Cq90J16wR6RkiWVhUF4rb4KovMPp_U__sqoZEF741Jmg>
Received: from macbook-pro.mnot.net (unknown [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 823DE30614FA; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:11:57 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <25ce5f62-a7a0-d60f-bb3b-ccdfc39ab44e@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:11:54 +1100
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <278CFEB9-EE9D-442B-B048-E91B571D6EAA@mnot.net>
References: <C295C393-9602-4D41-9071-30629605E349@apple.com> <1a733857-e621-2ace-ad9a-1e3d872acf25@gmx.de> <3B46D138-971F-4602-8E54-4EE903EA5F24@mnot.net> <5b050bce-4740-4d48-60d5-3ee5678326a9@gmx.de> <F9777B9B-2D5E-4A29-A6D4-F6273437057D@mnot.net> <25ce5f62-a7a0-d60f-bb3b-ccdfc39ab44e@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1j9MKL-0000vU-Mh 2d7cccddcc995867be3baf918d545095
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Headers for HTTP
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/278CFEB9-EE9D-442B-B048-E91B571D6EAA@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37403
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>


> On 25 Feb 2020, at 5:08 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 25.02.2020 01:34, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> ...
>>> Or just "Structured Field Values for HTTP".
>> 
>> That's better, and I think I can live with it -- as long as we establish that "Structured Headers" is an alias for it (and still use that in-spec, as it's in a number of places). Make sense?
> 
> WFM.

See:
  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/d5787b89820cb


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email