Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 06:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2BD127077 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEWY5L_uOmLz for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D3312EB0F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1d0MxR-000644-By for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:49:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:49:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1d0MxR-000644-By@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1d0MxO-0005zI-Lj for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:49:46 +0000
Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1d0MxI-000741-Kw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:49:41 +0000
Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 88so28601295lfr.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=46B7kiD6ba1pzb7vIdLBMFVYv+IG93qlNGNk9dYnH68=; b=Gg1sfv5x2Bu/sbnTz4vsZOvQUKRhIquqmIoNHeqfRxczIua2KNSpmvm2lHLqY6VnRL LxtPwi1cA8EnTDCXqPgXUyexNoSXQBQQb26857mvSThe+a6uz9NZldlp66WoC8ndLYJy x1ThhMGfN1Z1UaSQr98bg/ftIX2RQpLakVqOgN9TcV+szLNtguiaZ9SaAVL+gRaxgegb pW51A4Qk13gA/I9FfopvNwVFkO7UJUu17EOIDbp+Dtdk6GuZz5/t+FH/smQ1SCo6gODO 2Ph1tUrnXcJ+Cy2g9SgWcsFx9jtS+HkghaxV7L4YZ8q2Mu1ltPZEzvziHnJ0ldk9eQ+I UDWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=46B7kiD6ba1pzb7vIdLBMFVYv+IG93qlNGNk9dYnH68=; b=dKZ/Wigirc3EKzOZ1tDVxIGOA80Rs5Q2p6+wLBeOC25P3hVPozxwL8Sp3lQsl9Rmp3 vA/hb1XasnTeGtzdlFU33PGW+y70aibe/t+MI2CheJRrkBBVrXyJr0Noub1snu2M7Uyi zMs21p6Fy2LEIP2s/lPtsx2Qb2kpeeUnJXdwK/VI+zbJ9b/3BLpsWTK2MhQPOoAmqZEG xeYT+VZFrFY7CrbY1y7nV7a52barmP+2SpPeEXkaoBTqWDS8DD0w3iBnjfAoWDCqHQsw ehql/FWENDi4HWHSeniaiGaQh6NDwicB5lqpytcZEEccN9iSgJJB54Vut8UhsKqFj32g gBcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4p7oPMtbu2m1b5VS7rInM6ecqro9hOfKvwNpdNwyWOcR1QmepT QBmVLMDhyvy8qTfEVAj93QEjTWyPAlKa
X-Received: by 10.25.79.27 with SMTP id d27mr2802667lfb.76.1492498153390; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.83.5 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149145796867.21962.18267109107454658774@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149145796867.21962.18267109107454658774@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:49:12 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUFBGngUzqM0GjpwyvF0w9pCB3eqFgxL8LY_R1otp49dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.44; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.212, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1d0MxI-000741-Kw 0d9ff1e9ecdce2e751b2d4a514c73790
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUFBGngUzqM0GjpwyvF0w9pCB3eqFgxL8LY_R1otp49dw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33816
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thanks Pete, On 6 April 2017 at 15:52, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote: > A "keyid" parameter SHOULD be a UTF-8 > [RFC3629] encoded string, particularly where the identifier > might > need to appear in a textual form. > > I presume that simply means "might need to be rendered" and does not > include "might need to be typed in by someone", correct? The former is > easy; the latter probably requires a bit more text. Indeed. Until we have a good copy-and-paste version of the Unicode typed/spoken/interpretive-danced input problem for security identifiers, it is not a goal to have specifications casually tackling problems that are outside their (and maybe anyone's) capabilities. I made the suggested change in the editor's copy.
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis… Martin Thomson
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-enc… Pete Resnick