IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SPDY Header Frames

"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> Tue, 17 July 2012 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B188D21F85D8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c88ooVCdG+n2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A7321F85F8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SrCrs-0001Qz-LT for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:51:32 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:51:32 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SrCrs-0001Qz-LT@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>) id 1SrCrk-0001P7-5k for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:51:24 +0000
Received: from smtpout1.laposte.net ([193.253.67.226] helo=smtpout.laposte.net) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>) id 1SrCri-0001a2-NA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:51:24 +0000
Received: from arekh.dyndns.org ([88.174.226.208]) by mwinf8501-out with ME id bWqu1j00H4WQcrc03WqvmW; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:50:55 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arekh.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CE22E38D4; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from arekh.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arekh.okg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAow_b3sLZ2A; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:50:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from arekh.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arekh.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:50:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 192.168.0.4 (SquirrelMail authenticated user nim) by arekh.dyndns.org with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:50:41 +0200
Message-ID: <34f9c6a0d9659dcfc9adcf38fdace0dd.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:50:41 +0200
From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-8.fc18
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.253.67.226; envelope-from=nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net; helo=smtpout.laposte.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1SrCri-0001a2-NA 741593744cc38af3804f07316db0ccfd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SPDY Header Frames
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/34f9c6a0d9659dcfc9adcf38fdace0dd.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/14357
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@...> writes:

>
> On 2012-07-17 15:38, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> > There must be a smarter way than "User-Agent:"...
>
> Actually one nice potential optimization is if the server can declare
> that it's not interested in the User-Agent at all; see
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-browser-hints-03#section-5.7>

The server may not be interested by intermediaries may still be

(while ugly user-agent special-casing is quite useful for proxy operators
that have to contend with web clients that were never really tested with
proxies and misbehave big way)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email