RE: Compression update
RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> Thu, 11 July 2013 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BDF21F9EB3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuqmD88j-v5o for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16ACC21F91CC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UxJRA-0008HS-BK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UxJRA-0008HS-BK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>) id 1UxJR0-0008GY-DT for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:34 +0000
Received: from inari-msr.crf.canon.fr ([194.2.158.67]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>) id 1UxJQz-0007p7-6I for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:34 +0000
Received: from mir-bsr.corp.crf.canon.fr (mir-bsr.corp.crf.canon.fr [172.19.77.99]) by inari-msr.crf.canon.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6BG95pW031871; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:05 +0200
Received: from ADELE.crf.canon.fr (adele.fesl2.crf.canon.fr [172.19.70.17]) by mir-bsr.corp.crf.canon.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6BG94WF029776; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:04 +0200
Received: from ADELE.crf.canon.fr ([::1]) by ADELE.crf.canon.fr ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:09:04 +0200
From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: Compression update
Thread-Index: AQHOfa2YZVewlCuBxESTZoNkZhfmA5lfpmBQ
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:03 +0000
Message-ID: <6C71876BDCCD01488E70A2399529D5E525EF001B@ADELE.crf.canon.fr>
References: <CABkgnnVzrL3wju1iJ2eDETpGtn4J6+vJe19GZTHnX5OayBhr6Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVzrL3wju1iJ2eDETpGtn4J6+vJe19GZTHnX5OayBhr6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, fr-FR
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.5.239]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none client-ip=194.2.158.67; envelope-from=Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr; helo=inari-msr.crf.canon.fr
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.287, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.303
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UxJQz-0007p7-6I cf76a3b421d41176131cc3806cca78d2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Compression update
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6C71876BDCCD01488E70A2399529D5E525EF001B@ADELE.crf.canon.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18693
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Yes, the eviction algorithm needed some clarification. I went for the proposal which had the most support on the mailing list. Hervé. > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] > Sent: mercredi 10 juillet 2013 22:37 > To: HTTP Working Group > Subject: Compression update > > The header compression draft has been revised and aside from some > clarifications, it includes a changed eviction algorithm. > > Are the working group comfortable - particularly those who are > implementing this for the Hamburg interim - with the revised algorithm? > > Also, I'd like opinions on whether -05 should be issued to refer to this draft, > or whether we can get by with -04. I really want to avoid any confusion over > what string we are negotiating if it comes to ALPN, NPN or Upgrade > negotiation. Currently, that string is "HTTP-draft-04/2.0", updating to -05 > would likely require that people negotiate "HTTP-draft-05/2.0".
- Compression update Martin Thomson
- Re: Compression update Amos Jeffries
- RE: Compression update RUELLAN Herve