IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Emily Stark <estark@google.com> Sat, 10 November 2018 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CCC1286D9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:33:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBQRCj-OjP3Y for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBEDE124BAA for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1gLX6o-0002ug-97 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:31:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:31:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1gLX6o-0002ug-97@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <estark@google.com>) id 1gLX6m-0002u3-3W for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:31:44 +0000
Received: from mail-yw1-xc34.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <estark@google.com>) id 1gLX6l-0001Gc-26 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:31:43 +0000
Received: by mail-yw1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id v8-v6so2884509ywh.6 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:31:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pEOofMAapXB9FcH9+2iyBEnSwYtVdA3DMKFX3c7XvlA=; b=jPNPVKI4JrnfQEMlPcarl6K1AkZeZ+Yk80UvAMgVr8xtm7UOZVlPf3D1UfqkeL6GB+ 7athoAVn3ooMebas+/0sUqE1iXf70c4eBp1w47Q7cti8FTD0ndddgIpqQxX0edyI8XxS SUm3C/KosFWOkUAym0wCmyy2r1AF4Ply7M65aBBzI8p05IXxo7Qcu5UV2EGliu20Ub/M m5M72ISPpRmsOtv5InjJ/SiL7I1bJvZQ5BciQomiL5G9OBsOe0Ve71nsX4qGklDfMAMJ rOmNGRfnYo22yApAF7QpgndJlm7fNykZfgkxwF61GMf+uuyTQvH0C85hxkvGud/hBNPp 8Ozg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pEOofMAapXB9FcH9+2iyBEnSwYtVdA3DMKFX3c7XvlA=; b=OGSj5/dchgNRHbmQ7u+z28KhBCzzLRFdv1RfDWjP31Fzahqb15KosqITimKu701tSO lkn566HxTOzh5465fcRuL4hab+PtSBJYWZQ+kls0dNHVXYzWkrearPv/KdCkVEJaHe5F 050zibXKLiUVE5Je/ArRVZq6lnEj+xfs9XxrFL5jdY8Atpdq+JtREGxmhHtEOTvI5CN0 MDkmAu5naSKTWHNner7TafVZ9W8wh++LPHFu0oWqhclgs+WGMfbQI95JcpxhKPN15lYW N9AgyxhthRlAEEbdzgc3PKexDutOwtV486EUh6xsv6Xx7GSFzQNoT1gJEteGlQ9dxVf+ De5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIOu7kfmrfVvGLqeEcBqxQypDakLXpqFz3x3QLOMIICYplQSK4n RU3YxdLTBX00JYZw2rMtb4eco+6xcKHzJ6VSSWyAfQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5d4RZVRBVhbAP1+aBKD27S2X2pltKEfk6+sELRRSFv6qO+z+kT2lXtd+Vi5SPLPnUV4/xBEEdiwW0Ch61etMsc=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:2953:: with SMTP id p80-v6mr13065897ywp.407.1541871082056; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:31:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153682169290.9530.10396840495307914328.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <050cd76f-cd38-3495-e76b-66ab2e1201ab@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <050cd76f-cd38-3495-e76b-66ab2e1201ab@gmx.de>
From: Emily Stark <estark@google.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:31:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPP_2Saey9jhsi4NLe-ugXApjdvCJg=qsS=B4n0FQ9ASFiumaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: adam@nostrum.com, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023188a057a52d6d0"
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-21.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1gLX6l-0001Gc-26 ba09c47bf8463d71b765df40112e9565
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAPP_2Saey9jhsi4NLe-ugXApjdvCJg=qsS=B4n0FQ9ASFiumaw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36046
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Adam,
Thanks for the review. I've addressed your comments in
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/d6e31360bdeeace4b8271162b0a8d25b836eb446.
(Some of them had already been fixed during other reviews.)
Emily

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:25 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 9/13/2018 8:54 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> > ...
> > §2.1.3:
> >
> >>   The "max-age" directive is REQUIRED to be present within an "Expect-
> >>   CT" header field.
> >
> > This doesn't appear to be true as stated; or, at least, it is stated in a
> > somewhat confusing way. A casual reading of this requirement is that an
> > "Expect-CT" header field is noncompliant if it is missing this directive.
> > Based on the examples given, the actual requirement here is that a
> response
> > that contains an Expect-CT header field MUST contain an Expect-CT header
> field
> > with a max-age directive, although that directive does not necessarily
> need to
> > appear in each Expect-CT header field. This should probably be clarified.
> > ...
>
> That's another case where progress on
> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/111> would help. This
> plagues other WG drafts as well.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email