IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 14 September 2018 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84208130F21 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lt9vxeL0PkgZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D17130E44 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1g0pwq-0003ex-7M for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:23:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:23:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1g0pwq-0003ex-7M@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>) id 1g0pwk-0003eF-LZ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:23:50 +0000
Received: from waldorf.isode.com ([62.232.206.188]) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>) id 1g0pwi-0002zM-9D for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:23:50 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1536938606; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=tqAfEwaYop+1KHdEXde6lH73ym3NsvPLjKUstgM0swo=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=fjjzBjILbf6mEhkmvFxCQDRtvaCZzJltjBlef2Wg6oWlIOMV0VqiwbUEyRP6a3UHUlAF8f zxTTbBASLqBqJoO7cxz35WZTE28fKvpKxmRUYD5RJyEJNT/KucCElhblhbxHUipulv78rI APtHy9Lc1h4sEgvZNyBQb7O9G2WsAig=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <W5vSbgAFZEuo@waldorf.isode.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:23:26 +0100
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <153682169290.9530.10396840495307914328.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOdDvNobqcQ9VEpQ1V+AoMoT390eCc4+O2YXpHAqjwdUXO8Tag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <14d7d9d2-7218-2b88-71e7-7ee3707d4e44@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:23:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNobqcQ9VEpQ1V+AoMoT390eCc4+O2YXpHAqjwdUXO8Tag@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0692917C3F6371EAEA57C4CE"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.873, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1g0pwi-0002zM-9D 2fe1d8294b47f2eb2b67bb3b5b75dae2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/14d7d9d2-7218-2b88-71e7-7ee3707d4e44@isode.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35914
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi all,

On 14/09/2018 16:14, Patrick McManus wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     DISCUSS:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Thanks for the work done on defining this mechanism! I think it's
>     quite
>     useful, and I plan to ballot "Yes" as soon as the minor but
>     important issue
>     below is fixed.
>
>     §6.1:
>
>     >  Status:  standard
>
>     My reading of RFC 3864 does not allow Experimental RFCs to
>     register HTTP header
>     fields as "Status: Standard."
>
>
> agree that should be experimental

This should already be fixed in the editor's copy.

Best Regards,

Alexey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email