Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4839)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 26 October 2016 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF66129A15 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iD31qLStrbX5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E8631299FF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bzGvN-0003t4-M5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 05:38:53 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 05:38:53 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bzGvN-0003t4-M5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bzGvG-0003sJ-K3 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 05:38:46 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bzGvE-00017Q-LY for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 05:38:46 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8314022E253; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:38:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161023102818.15916B80343@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:38:12 +1100
Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, etan.kissling@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C48DF588-673D-488F-87EE-229A03C1B815@mnot.net>
References: <20161023102818.15916B80343@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.026, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bzGvE-00017Q-LY 7c7559053a3f668c2a986a03eab50352
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4839)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/C48DF588-673D-488F-87EE-229A03C1B815@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32673
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Verified.

(This seems to have slipped into one of the very last drafts of the bis process without being noticed; see <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2519>).

Cheers,


> On 23 Oct. 2016, at 9:28 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4839
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Etan Kissling <etan.kissling@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   Parameters are in the form of a name or name=value pair.
> 
>     transfer-parameter = token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string )
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   Parameters are in the form of a name=value pair.
> 
>     transfer-parameter = token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string )
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The ABNF does not allow the form of a name.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7230 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-26)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing
> Publication Date    : June 2014
> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/