IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Wed, 18 January 2017 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FE61293E8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:10:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SH8J0mmVU7Xs for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9528A120727 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cTmCq-0005Zz-W9 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:07:01 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:07:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cTmCq-0005Zz-W9@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1cTmCn-0005ZD-5h for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:06:57 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1cTmCg-0002TI-W8 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:06:51 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c206so14961783wme.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:06:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1eHyRik0EHRYuggFs5yaYx7tF77SKJ2X9xBx7hveBeY=; b=EEC3C3LSh3XTkQskpNtJYtO9aFpnO/wRxdp9eUIDiZEOX6V9hF9gjaLvGYf+YfoBIY YuSzDcQ5e40V4A1XYTYC4dO5NnfJckILeadTY0BpXj4ByOKr/+jyu7bsv+TasuRjyIfq PV7Z6jB/nLOj3Kgjhw+m3WIerMJdPrRxVnPizhTodJaJ4XpaHeg4HFoaba1c/1uunbGM hidg6Y9r3j3qot8uklVAJdJ63Up0NHs9Z6oa/in0sZoMeqA5/WLJMDAn4vcZLWCR6RXP Zn8ybNSA3O+lY4djMuz+8KNO117iU4akTCOD4aUeXc2bVSAf+2sh62M1ydB1AURFWx3N BcsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1eHyRik0EHRYuggFs5yaYx7tF77SKJ2X9xBx7hveBeY=; b=Q+AR6mIZX9CDNPPRLr8sC6pgdHueNny5dRY43bxilLTjwiy+W2ALH5YwltkP5QK5+W l2vHNAV9zZqxKv2Qmmjz+4HILOmFUYhBi0dRS/g+XH5aPOopWHCqC0m97Szl8Jfhy88o PoDnZYBzMWkzprjoMNUQmlrnkhLzq/bV/XC4zNRTK7UtdSU3uFDFJd03ZW1GWfZJdYs6 oIRBTs195HCRO7mUeWQimkDNYyENvcx4F2cW3yuxluJv5QAxxfFXkDGUMo94nFXiPXh3 dIPdMkuf7Hw+SUzXkd/fsWQjvjajBQUOeJl83xUipSnGQifZF4aBnOQVdcpI9X9PUo2i CUog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI0hD7jsp8wgyBZjfQwKchKZMR6MagM7Mo5cdc7heal0H1WVF57QVecj7aWJ9mKdw==
X-Received: by 10.28.126.11 with SMTP id z11mr18666943wmc.13.1484730383436; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (197.71.125.91.dyn.plus.net. [91.125.71.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm3407254wmf.1.2017.01.18.01.06.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWmPdDXVS+CvmChRjyqkJooSKgy6KdUdN+9nGzOyJazhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:06:20 +0000
Cc: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, Scott Mitchell <scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <818C0433-C12B-4E56-B428-BC5633082D1C@lukasa.co.uk>
References: <CAFn2buAYWHQSWhhoKZ2GKbqXR1A+tScjkAwZmOuQ9gV9jMp2bA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyZ6=Kh3n+RJi=RqgFBojgRDpfJ=nbr0i4kvO20ET0Kt7UA8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWmPdDXVS+CvmChRjyqkJooSKgy6KdUdN+9nGzOyJazhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.50; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-wm0-f50.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.574, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cTmCg-0002TI-W8 9397f9f88e0e3d9a650682e4318063fe
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/818C0433-C12B-4E56-B428-BC5633082D1C@lukasa.co.uk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33315
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 17 Jan 2017, at 22:27, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that we probably want to clarify the point by explicitly
> saying that PRIORITY doesn't affect stream states.  We say that it can
> be sent in any state, but we don't also mention that important point.
> Do people here agree that an erratum on this point is appropriate
> here?

Yeah. The community has managed to coalesce around the “right” answer, I think, but it would help to have it stated more explicitly in the specification.

Cory

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email