IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Thu, 12 March 2015 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573FD1A89A5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMgvWVk-qpqF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1F31A89A7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YVsHL-0002HQ-Gt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:51:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:51:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YVsHL-0002HQ-Gt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1YVsHG-0002Gj-2r for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:51:10 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1YVsHE-0005JE-Kz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:51:09 +0000
Received: from [192.168.20.19] (121-99-59-16.bng1.tvc.orcon.net.nz [121.99.59.16]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CF4E6FF0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:50:35 +1300 (NZDT)
Message-ID: <5500F0E4.5050707@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:50:28 +1300
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20150311160240.30935.69348.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A5A4F525-DFCA-42F5-AA6B-1DDC86C87485@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <A5A4F525-DFCA-42F5-AA6B-1DDC86C87485@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.417, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YVsHE-0005JE-Kz d7a3780a8255f941aedd78c295ba77ae
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5500F0E4.5050707@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28936
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 12/03/2015 12:25 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> This draft contains some last-minute editorial updates that I caught during the shepherd review:
>   https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt
> 
> ... and with that, I think we have WG consensus to submit. 
> 

The change itself and the changelog entry do not match.

The text is now saying the Proxy-Authorization header is *not*
applicable. When a Proxy-Authoriation may be what actually exists.

The new words need to be "indicated by Authorization or
Proxy-Authorization" or some equivalent.

Amos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email