Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 17 March 2015 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B691A00DB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Deb02YVfwyLJ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41CE31A00D6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YXlgz-0004uq-2a for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:13:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:13:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YXlgz-0004uq-2a@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YXlgt-0004tJ-2B for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:13:27 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YXlgs-0001WY-7F for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:13:27 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.177] ([84.187.35.147]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgHvY-1ZIwr81reu-00njBW; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:12:50 +0100
Message-ID: <5507D3F0.4090004@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:12:48 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <20150311160240.30935.69348.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A5A4F525-DFCA-42F5-AA6B-1DDC86C87485@mnot.net> <5500F0E4.5050707@treenet.co.nz> <FE8F2E42-9439-4C27-BC50-5C736E2E0AA4@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <FE8F2E42-9439-4C27-BC50-5C736E2E0AA4@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:T+81f4clLdS615eynKp8xhZEri9LT5Vg6XhaphORw0S2keLl2+C SfWaUOs3W89cZ7rSD/yHTPxICbDSdpiX7XmGpCQ1s9yK1NBo2vJioGXl3ep6Xy3jrYpSTTZ yTA+eWVXZt0i9pdzWXCI9BcfD+qN6j3cUpO9IagbxwOBxmtuB7M+Y8LvTufeYCr+bxv8bi9 EjyjU+drf2eqyL/ty8iKQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.284, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_IRA=-2, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-0.1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YXlgs-0001WY-7F 65c39dcacc85ddd6872c65add2c03978
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5507D3F0.4090004@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28979
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-03-12 03:30, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> The changelog is removed before the RFC is published, so I think we're OK there.
>
> WRT the text, I think we can fix that by adding an equivalent proviso to proxy-auth-info, e.g.,:
>
> """
> The Proxy-Authentication-Info response header field is equivalent to Authentication-Info, except that its semantics are defined by the authentication scheme indicated by the Proxy-Authorization header field of the corresponding request, and applies to proxy authentication.
> """
>
> We can do that as part of LC processing (we just wanted to get this change in before that because of the change IPR declaration).

Done in 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/f06bc492259a5a7762fdc168bffa736dc5afcc3c>.

Best regards, Julian