IETF Logo Mail Archive

Call For Adoption: Secondary Certificates

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Tue, 21 November 2017 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B0F1270AC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:49:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sendgrid.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-WW4AEK02pj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B2B129BAF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1eHFL1-0001x7-1G for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:40:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:40:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1eHFL1-0001x7-1G@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1eHFKs-0000u7-NW for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:40:02 +0000
Received: from o1682455182.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net ([168.245.5.182]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1eHFKp-0005eR-O3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:40:01 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=mime-version:from:subject:to:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=U/3WhupiWeSG5A0k8tn5adC0szg=; b=qoNK+TU0Lgsj3NAOCN/UCXTTVL53I EhNJQcaEEtJF7mv9foeIMMDZ/oVpEMSMedqFxgCHtaRyVbpyQ+4bbdmQkMyPNnDC pJnKtRPxV7dmmFeSR/774AzpaiXxalsUg86HoKUZjFpjmcNpUFeCw7+Yb5dhzQXJ gnbROtdVZzfUZs=
Received: by filter0005p3mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0005p3mdw1-17784-5A148F07-B 2017-11-21 20:39:35.238240363 +0000 UTC
Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com (mail-lf0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) by ismtpd0006p1lon1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id pQvJdREGSgSErb2K81Z6sw for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:39:35.000 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m1so15662064lfj.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:39:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5d8Gfe8uB1ncJVB285X/8iNPZgrmQC+leJ1ZeBPkYpkL+zuHdH +04LfsxYyRhUbghr9r37T1B+ADmBC36zd4GlisY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaLYAQYc43By21bEqVC30qtNNEhURhBhAahOA6zwJdeXN0Bywj9dZvEc2QY9YKXBkVYkqfPyTwL8Yp02E16IGo=
X-Received: by 10.25.23.165 with SMTP id 37mr4940355lfx.127.1511296774254; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:39:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.166.143 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:39:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:39:35 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrAQgMcau6dTkbL7v9iwYGqfV2rr=DkHEiquL7ft+kuuA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrAQgMcau6dTkbL7v9iwYGqfV2rr=DkHEiquL7ft+kuuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11401a046138d7055e843347"
X-SG-EID: YLWet4rakcOTMHWvPPwWbcsiUJbN1FCn0PHYd/Uujh7ey+RCwWc78QK2nu9e6njV2pkY9bRBxABM9i gZncfdKdbZbFFz3Y6eiNbDt4SIrjx5oI5ohahG2ZYv3K8KapcczcwZVtf6/CihgdYbXeo4IL5JZskw stzxmnQ0OI9sEpXfrZLrWuOCwAdFDWbsOnCAIrnX2kju/ZbsjldjgL3/3mvKfZ6c6NLpKhbIe3USnQ I=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=168.245.5.182; envelope-from=bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net; helo=o1682455182.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1eHFKp-0005eR-O3 34f2fe93f0d89fb98ad7e13d335359d0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Call For Adoption: Secondary Certificates
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNrAQgMcau6dTkbL7v9iwYGqfV2rr=DkHEiquL7ft+kuuA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/34827
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Fellow HTTPBis members,

As discussed in Singapore we're going to open a short Call For Adoption
regarding the Secondary Certificates draft presented during IETF 100.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-05

Sentiment in the room clearly favored adoption and reached a sufficient
level of interest to justify doing so... and the chairs agree this is
topical and important work. but of course we confirm all of these actions
on the list - so if you have further input or especially objections we
haven't heard please let them be known in the next week.

Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email