IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call For Adoption: Secondary Certificates

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Mon, 04 December 2017 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA7B12711D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:58:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sendgrid.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIkEZeqp2dq3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E60C71267BB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1eLxgk-0005u2-6b for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:50:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:50:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1eLxgk-0005u2-6b@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1eLxgV-0004JE-Kt for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:49:51 +0000
Received: from o1682455182.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net ([168.245.5.182]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1eLxgR-0004Ty-Qz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:49:51 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=yH94Jw1mqnk0lI7opVzKke+mt20=; b=yTbqqI/42YEYVDJRXS RULiNWc0ZmwoXhVDOVJZZhNNu+Nnq11HON7fckU9gIvJUwUxAqU/157oB3iqLjiq i/5GAgAd98jdW377yAPBkdbFXkBkqagWYKIV3zH98WoW7HX2euyeQOW5muvWKVvV DsoL7trv2IHIgDC79ghSlG3B4=
Received: by filter0010p3las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0010p3las1-15236-5A25B4CF-13 2017-12-04 20:49:19.635147807 +0000 UTC
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by ismtpd0004p1lon1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id FwORMfGfQ3OxDvmfTYMmBw for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:49:19.077 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t197so20735219lfe.7 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:49:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7K4MR8YFNLHb1GMNhp/BfiBGtvSOn/4zrrf5HKA9GHr2dxf4Bq t1K+n4RgnyrrMlCWVKWnm0+AJIk0/jcx4gQRNzU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMao1fgMadZ/G0dBu9ooOUhDVUunt5ZyrNMND+JhOIIbB4KTPsat3LHXsjXcdwolu78FrpJtuGKgB7cJR73XuXE=
X-Received: by 10.46.71.133 with SMTP id u127mr9546753lja.52.1512420558162; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:49:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.166.143 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:49:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNrAQgMcau6dTkbL7v9iwYGqfV2rr=DkHEiquL7ft+kuuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNrAQgMcau6dTkbL7v9iwYGqfV2rr=DkHEiquL7ft+kuuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:49:19 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNoZuPM_9sxYcm4nCcWfX8QB2k=tcVHXfQdto6Uao7qCKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNoZuPM_9sxYcm4nCcWfX8QB2k=tcVHXfQdto6Uao7qCKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140754c1ed107055f89daba"
X-SG-EID: YLWet4rakcOTMHWvPPwWbcsiUJbN1FCn0PHYd/Uujh6ekAcuV/R9jkVjaQ1orXF1+6ex5JMXgUZzby 5Ni/WzI+p/EzcPtOqwTpRVBV65+hPXRwtaslbDluLroY+QIPwGqynKhzhDXa1VjDoR7c/On+ldI25z 3oo6C340XsIsRwH0H3aLa+4rjbN+PvVFYFo6S2up3d40DLrO/hZTz3Md43nEmOgCGfvLaiy3oYgALj I=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=168.245.5.182; envelope-from=bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net; helo=o1682455182.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.560, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1eLxgR-0004Ty-Qz bb8e0ca869f69a13a70c502427b98d7b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call For Adoption: Secondary Certificates
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNoZuPM_9sxYcm4nCcWfX8QB2k=tcVHXfQdto6Uao7qCKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/34918
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The CfA period has ended and we will adopt this work based on consensus to
do so.

Mike, Nick, Martin - would one of you be so kind as to submit a working
group 00 version to the data tracker?

And also upload to the git repo? I've added Mike and Nick as editors
(Martin already had that bit.)

Thanks!


On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
wrote:

> Fellow HTTPBis members,
>
> As discussed in Singapore we're going to open a short Call For Adoption
> regarding the Secondary Certificates draft presented during IETF 100.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-05
>
> Sentiment in the room clearly favored adoption and reached a sufficient
> level of interest to justify doing so... and the chairs agree this is
> topical and important work. but of course we confirm all of these actions
> on the list - so if you have further input or especially objections we
> haven't heard please let them be known in the next week.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email