Re: Status code 451 adoption

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 17 April 2013 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D6921E809C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJ7033sCeEGT for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0403221E8093 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1USYgu-000079-Kb for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:10:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:10:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1USYgu-000079-Kb@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1USYgr-00006O-T4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:10:49 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1USYgr-00013A-0f for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:10:49 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.31]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LdKAB-1UsqsR1QPp-00iTX4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:10:22 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2013 20:10:22 -0000
Received: from p54BB2853.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.117]) [84.187.40.83] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 17 Apr 2013 22:10:22 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+yCaYV5R+ykdZEnMoFTW2Sf3yQmih12xUb6ZwX3z MTpOc8zVVXyG7J
Message-ID: <516F01AA.7020002@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:10:18 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
CC: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CAHBU6ityXJne5SbaUXo1hyLrKe43bU3ejVOMN7Tu=tS72h1bAQ@mail.gmail.com> <30003DCB-33F1-4D8B-B141-AB1A175AFC82@mnot.net> <20130416074407.GA31249@nic.fr> <CAHBU6itK-FznB_OE5qzZJKM0QFPtbGdQZVQFb29fwrNpJfDq3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6isdevhE_UUFKG-Rt5=yZYUyrXksp6M7YVwNRBmzMjnmHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6isdevhE_UUFKG-Rt5=yZYUyrXksp6M7YVwNRBmzMjnmHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.100, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1USYgr-00013A-0f 5abfa1ad3a5d7a429bf8c977e06945ab
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status code 451 adoption
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/516F01AA.7020002@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17297
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2013-04-16 17:59, Tim Bray wrote:
> Also, check out these (really rather good) large-format HTTP posters:
> https://github.com/bigcompany/know-your-http#readme
> ...

I had a look at the "methods" poster, and was unimpressed.

- it's very misleading to say something as GET being defined by HTTP/1.0

- it leaves out the fact that there is a method registry

- it has the idempotence of PATCH wrong

Best regards, Julian