Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE1521E80C5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6rvC7u-7Jr9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2E821E80C4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SOyNe-0005U1-Nq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:43:38 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1SOyNV-0005Qn-Cc for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:43:29 +0000
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1SOyNR-00035q-V6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:43:27 +0000
Received: by qadb15 with SMTP id b15so1839952qad.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=UMsCDbfWvHvDk5lUO0EqH5/1JLnFnXbcEOz42wNEgZs=; b=XbNx5ZRe7grYEiv7b7cIlMUFReOyKOkwyDUONLWFXE/pm5JebpFejkMiIlcmcR42Fu a6AWZFavv7a1KRWVobmORRwS+GHvjtv0kz82tjWjn5jaP69ywAOna0s5M8SkmVifYJwj VNtvyDCbetVE5OYsHAAyU8eFtVvUHEBgDAwbzd82VdoqsFe562NvuJor7jJapzKreXdm VGKW0yuonbEt5Vpqc+TgVp8sZl14P88unGXrQRd1XQ7ry82Ss9jR2/r44H4wbvcfn0Bv 2G8X9bC9f+PLQKHUy+ubCukg9DenoJPDZcgmj8qw6Ou+v/gmJnCjh1nG/ns9nGX1pr/e /9ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=UMsCDbfWvHvDk5lUO0EqH5/1JLnFnXbcEOz42wNEgZs=; b=l6mNxBTEhgeMX8Seo6Bxo/ZBfsBr/9gEZclGcZXk+VYoYof7YXRp46oIx0arK8SNDA oneIfOL8zUMxkrwjabziDxmhaJI0qIB8mgHT9ullpD4In3SJVJNcbMTtxHOQcF20VwoV YoJf8GjyYWqWcIuBr1+f9aprCNkUq6+xlxPKa7PSJLJM2It02RCY8d3u5XKV61kzoKO+ 51K13dAIUhHz0s8mMCyRHyvrYG11cOEaRK5MaHvMEge4LwfuS0warlagwtX4Nrpu2zol 0jtaYF0R1rCmVJXt17aU5HHduIF2+o15KaMN6Dm87Ppy3XqymqcP+vnaYr2tKlGGFa3d W+Vg==
Received: by 10.229.134.195 with SMTP id k3mr5868756qct.11.1335822180362; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.134.195 with SMTP id k3mr5868745qct.11.1335822180188; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.12.11 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:00 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a9uGOqa1egp6WiO6HeeMjAdELrI
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYjOPgCse6giEmy3f_MzRTC3K25oAWeAavHnzywc5pL91w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00248c711bb988830a04beec5634
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/8HTxbT0VtSOTHX9vR1DHk1rouN3VFoBMFRc9DTFrUY3O0VMPA/AVIvPqvSHLKO9w4b/DpWf+2VuT+wxV7aY9A8WR9X1Y8OEPK/EkKuAncIZi1lIr6G9TNFvYOx4BKzo5YG8AVL/RXwiecgxUHQ6E5/4XhQ==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.43; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qa0-f43.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1SOyNR-00035q-V6 5f64f4ec65bbe33b4640a53686f64365
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYjOPgCse6giEmy3f_MzRTC3K25oAWeAavHnzywc5pL91w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13497
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SOyNe-0005U1-Nq@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:43:38 +0000

FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy"
internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that fall
> under the HTTP/2.0 category?
>
> I may have some cycles for this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for:
>>
>> 1. HTTP/2.0
>> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes
>>
>> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>;.
>>
>> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0:
>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals>
>>
>> But none yet for authentication schemes:
>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals>
>>
>> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012.
>> It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a  good
>> sense of it by then, for discussion.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>