IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Ping/Pong body (was Re: TSV-Directorate review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-07)

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Thu, 19 May 2011 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73E6E06BA for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KssVd5QLEpie for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode.ducksong.com (linode.ducksong.com [64.22.125.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A057E0674 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by linode.ducksong.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D20CA10303; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:42:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.16.226] (cpe-67-253-92-25.maine.res.rr.com [67.253.92.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linode.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADB46101F5; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:42:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
To: Brian McKelvey <theturtle32@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <83059ABD-9F8A-49AB-86AB-B6345CDD9C39@gmail.com>
References: <ED13A76FCE9E96498B049688227AEA292C6A81E4@TK5EX14MBXC206.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <F390D8D1-335B-4595-93A2-0741DD693559@gmail.com> <ED13A76FCE9E96498B049688227AEA292C6A85DE@TK5EX14MBXC206.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <BANLkTimg6Z8rs+SDp-HX+FzJQukKndWqkg@mail.gmail.com> <83059ABD-9F8A-49AB-86AB-B6345CDD9C39@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:42:39 -0400
Message-ID: <1305769359.383.133.camel@ds9>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Ping/Pong body (was Re: TSV-Directorate review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-07)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 01:42:52 -0000

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 18:23 -0700, Brian McKelvey wrote:
> Indeed.. It's simpler for the protocol to state that a pong should be sent in response to a ping and leave it at that.
> 

agreed - I'm not seeing a compelling reason to make any particular
change from -07, though I would expect implementations to use it much
more conservatively than is allowed. And that's ok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email