IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] [dispatch] Publication request for draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00

Adam Rice <ricea@google.com> Fri, 23 June 2017 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ricea@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DB1129687 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLDUOpJZIJok for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com (mail-wr0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B14BA129353 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k67so60963982wrc.2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9eXKMLaHtify5+wwQiTH/IevKkwsa3yIGSJ0XqDM1CE=; b=J3jD0dNEOHM9YZZRloLhQle/HbOqHYkodXn7wMo9Tspy+sEDb97irFp/OB4PAOE90N woGxnho7yvUKLFPGHX7+OCRH3GcS/o2ipBvazOZmdkOp62hdmvU1KZHQ1hH490v33WbN d94Gs9jkpd7wmpCIdp4863/ioyVoZ2taDgBoDa6zNLIQtDOXCBwlD0sjyZTzkXVXhpAe 9R3jLxufjNSyr/vGP9rhsAPzuSqugTNEbJkHC+pE3f3CEzGCfAIFjY0R9ShgAuUNDmu5 6/FQoFd08nz9q4c5S5eJzqV5HV4pwhrX69s2P0ZxftMncaEDg4nxx83NJvIFagy/pT3N jKdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9eXKMLaHtify5+wwQiTH/IevKkwsa3yIGSJ0XqDM1CE=; b=IKhCmxhH7y2Ibm4CoQXuSzqhFMxX7TSDmXq4MAliRzrSPJIomzdg9SWqhB+Nzzgo/u Xil/y39khZOnth/UmiPyrKhxBppbCebIJx/gUSegW5L643vgbhBj/7wjgtFAJYzVo/Xv jlNHlrt3kQleXuILnHF82eHVAGE4g7rl7HVFAYjRQQHA2qU4KqpUHBkQ7DTS7g7x742l s4lrHjwqKZndvnmURHRYPaRCXy9Rb4NPMU0dNvQbgxz9d+sXZaW/8AIxiNaroFpN5Wlj Tf8uHG1Fe6pxc/ptvHrNjc6UylSLkMs+2zAeX5KgSLZy5DPaBwMUwUhTTv0hIxE3RxDv 7LgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxAFmX39q+q0ld5MxSRhUuEHdXTXnwvCCNaFSKFPMAHo3VKNaVG WFhsRbwKHfKc4rLVnczCWFbObwakJUaF
X-Received: by 10.223.135.105 with SMTP id 38mr5097065wrz.23.1498216724846; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.218.3 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6eb360bd-0d5c-4559-85c9-99716cf846ba@isode.com>
References: <594A9557.9080707@isode.com> <CADnb78i6wHw+u-Y5JfGpNuODxx30kUB8mcWuK1VDDL6VBTiQ1w@mail.gmail.com> <1498149228.3653703.1018087584.5D4E9087@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CADnb78gy2C5Lk4RWEkTS4ew_wvOx6vEwV_pNWQkGjYrpxbH19A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHixhFrrVoLAp5YPR8SvvdnH0za-VHasmtjqwjZc4ba2yf8Ysw@mail.gmail.com> <6eb360bd-0d5c-4559-85c9-99716cf846ba@isode.com>
From: Adam Rice <ricea@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 20:18:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHixhFrAffVRH=wLf7hqO3j5330s5GcnXw2+K=kvoR7NYfqS+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, dispatch@ietf.org, "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147fd6eaea7dd05529ec315"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/2yESLUB5Cd2_qhO0SjOd3l-JLkM>
Subject: Re: [hybi] [dispatch] Publication request for draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:18:49 -0000

Ah, I see, it's already planned to be used for coap-over-WebSocket. Sounds
good to me.

On 23 June 2017 at 19:41, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

> On 23/06/2017 11:35, Adam Rice wrote:
>
> On 23 June 2017 at 03:13, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>
>> The /.well-known/ thing only makes sense with respect to the WebSocket
>> handshake, no? And that's already defined to be an HTTP request. So
>> I'm not sure why any /.well-known/ things with regard to HTTP would
>> not already apply. (One of the reasons Fetch made this
>> change/clarification is to make sure HSTS, CSP, etc. would all apply
>> to WebSocket as well.)
>>
>
> If understand correctly, this permits a well-known WebSocket endpoint to
> be registered under /.well-known/, so it's not just about
> HTTP-compatibility.
>
>
> Right.
>
>
> I don't see any problems with the proposal, as long as it's actually going
> to be used. Is there a list of expected use-cases somewhere?
>
>
> Sections 7.3 and 7.4 of <https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> doc/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls/?include_text=1>
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls/?include_text=1>
> .
>
>
>

v2.1.10 | Report a Bug | By Email