IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Restarting IESG review on permessage-deflate

Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> Fri, 04 October 2013 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DD321F9C9B for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lkbhvTmMp1iW for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXHUB020-5.exch020.serverdata.net (exhub020-5.exch020.serverdata.net [206.225.164.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59F021F9C87 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net ([169.254.3.6]) by EXHUB020-5.exch020.serverdata.net ([206.225.164.32]) with mapi; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:58:18 -0700
From: Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
To: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@intalio.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:58:16 -0700
Thread-Topic: [hybi] Restarting IESG review on permessage-deflate
Thread-Index: Ac7BHmhkBzAhR0opQqOuBBF9OnMFtgAA+CyQ
Message-ID: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D4446790BFE9@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net>
References: <CAH9hSJbwd5qhMJw=3dwk3CDPua5ENRksd9=q2KDcyyma3uKzZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4zZZD8eq4w9kyQbX2AJcM1LA8=UyRO7txK7TvmYhSp=YU+9g@mail.gmail.com> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D4446790BF34@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <dmnt49hf1bbifiote81fumeamnk76vti1t@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D4446790BF87@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <CAG4zZZDdcC5+cob715KE77uZiPYAo1Oz6M0StLA=vSp5iX_h7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4zZZDdcC5+cob715KE77uZiPYAo1Oz6M0StLA=vSp5iX_h7A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Restarting IESG review on permessage-deflate
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:58:27 -0000

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote:
>>>>>We also find the nature of configuration parameters awkward (even if
>>>>>Java supported these specific ones) The whole "s2c" and "c2s" prefix noise is unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>>No, it's not.

>>>What is your reasoning?
>>We need to differentiate between parameter offers and parameter accepts, and do that for both directions.

>>If there is no prefix, both client and server would only be able to use the same parameters for both directions.

>That's desired actually, and consistent with behavior of other protocols and extensions (mux for example).
...
>Where does the need for the "s2c" and "c2s" prefixes come from?

The need comes from having different parameters for up- vs downstream.

The value of having different parameters up- vs. downstream is being able to optimize for the resource restrictions of both (client & server) independently.

/Tobias

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email