Re: [hybi] IETF-79
Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 17:53 UTC
Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CA33A7054 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id De7wlahLlQoF for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722DC3A7012 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.79]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o95HsWF6019540 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:54:33 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1286301273; bh=1RSLPjOzgCprteTehgajG7Uw6Xw=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Content-Type; b=ZwctmYPdISxQRw5SGiZG9sph2St9NRo1VFCuXVDJ+Y+wqqSmoKJyW5qPbN8LRQ60E vwsvhT13PXA/Zt07y3MGw==
Received: from qyk9 (qyk9.prod.google.com [10.241.83.137]) by kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o95Hrrhs012245 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:54:31 -0700
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so214285qyk.3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=n7l/o8mKsCoVDqzrTxDUmXc8IyibEVEXXsHQUycnMO4=; b=H+ulPmAcgx2ek++mij0oD4Q793nlUy6dQGZZ6kmOiwxxZSiBC5m4ZxKt6GAa76izAv B2pF8ipT8McwsslzQc4Q==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=nycJCNgPxJ3bs6hqzMyM/XsGfDHfXFKC5SXAB4WxA50PXAD+tYRy8HIAcbVy2WR7S0 tk7arkXP/KxfvE0k0KWw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.232.14 with SMTP id js14mr8660143qcb.103.1286301271248; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.13.225 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim2K1enQeXtZZi84V1uaKkegVRh0DQB5RM5gZrT@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTim2K1enQeXtZZi84V1uaKkegVRh0DQB5RM5gZrT@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:54:31 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKpcwin57NJ8CVc9Vutx2RMUvD4FABXPnABn-i@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)" <ifette@google.com>
To: hybi@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163630ff2f58d0aa0491e25a44"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Subject: Re: [hybi] IETF-79
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:53:40 -0000
SM points out that BOF isn't the right terminology. Apologies. What I meant was a meeting similar to the one we had at Maastricht a few months ago. Question still stands :) 2010/10/5 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> > Is there a HyBi BOF at IETF? Are enough people attending in Beijing that it > would make sense if that's not already scheduled? Could we make any progress > on e.g. handshake issues? > > -Ian >
- [hybi] IETF-79 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] IETF-79 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] IETF-79 S Moonesamy