Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback?

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 01 December 2010 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6BA3A6C64 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:31:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.244
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.244 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.355, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V+8Opjyx2a-3 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:31:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net (peirce.dave.cridland.net [217.155.137.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DC73A6B40 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7C01168106; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:32:13 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at peirce.dave.cridland.net
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pf848VVt35c; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:32:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from puncture (unknown [217.155.137.60]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 44FD111680FB; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:32:09 +0000 (GMT)
References: <AANLkTi=UpWdjqU0Lkh11wSGtHVDO71_CvjWJyH4mPyQi@mail.gmail.com> <4590EC7E9324CF43A2B37F81AFD6357007BB59B9@BANMLVEM07.e2k.ad.ge.com> <20101201105939.GK22787@shareable.org> <AANLkTinSRhb2N6_hfcXbfB5uM3pU+xubNN1kJcT5w3E4@mail.gmail.com> <20101201152622.GL22787@shareable.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101201152622.GL22787@shareable.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <2339.1291217529.283122@puncture>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:32:09 +0000
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>, "Alakkad, Achuth (GE Healthcare)" <Achuth.Alakkad@ge.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Bidirectional Streams Over Synchronous HTTP <bosh@xmpp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; delsp="yes"; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:31:32 -0000

On Wed Dec  1 15:26:22 2010, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Has anyone tried measuring the connection success rate - and
> messages/packets/data/latencies - of "valid" HTTP port 80  
> techniques:
> such as single-connection bidirectional chunked POST, and various
> dual-connection pipelined-POST/GET (one upstream, one downstream)?

The BOSH community might have done, so I've copied this over to their  
mailing list.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade