Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback?
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 30 November 2010 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C0928C112 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:35:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id boU0hqbO4KzM for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EA03A6C17 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (ip-216-17-182-51.rev.frii.com [216.17.182.51]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D488A4009B; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:47:45 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CF519F3.4020804@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:36:19 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
References: <AANLkTi=UpWdjqU0Lkh11wSGtHVDO71_CvjWJyH4mPyQi@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=UpWdjqU0Lkh11wSGtHVDO71_CvjWJyH4mPyQi@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080902040505040802030504"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:35:32 -0000
On 11/28/10 4:49 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote: > > So tell me again why we don't just ask IANA for a websocket port? > > Browsers can try to port and if it fails to connect they can fall back > to something like BOSH over port 80. > This get's us through firewalls and keep port 80 for HTTP. Agreed. BTW, IANA has port 5280 registered for BOSH, although it's often served up on port 80 or something else... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Alakkad, Achuth (GE Healthcare)
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Brodie Thiesfield
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Dave Cridland
- Re: [hybi] WS port with BOSH-like fallback? Jack Moffitt
- [hybi] WS handshake using BOSH? Alakkad, Achuth (GE Healthcare)