Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 27 October 2009 01:07 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2393A67F7 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.976, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2bnSYuR44ez for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE723A6778 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.5.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E36A509DE; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910270011060.13521@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:07:36 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C19DD55E-816F-4549-89B1-EEF7E50945F8@mnot.net>
References: <4ADEC7A0.7040307@ericsson.com> <4AE4CCBB.10001@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910260006420.9145@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AE553A0.9030208@ericsson.com> <73F5E810-F40F-42B8-81A9-4AD1306E360F@apple.com> <4AE57B62.4030209@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910270011060.13521@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:07:29 -0000
Ian -- There really isn't anything for proxy vendors to implement in WebSockets, is there? Provided that they support CONNECT, of course. To get proxy vendors on board, there will need to be overlay protocols that allow them, for example, to multiplex many client connections into one server connection, but that's far and above what WS does. Or do you intend to go in that direction? Cheers, On 27/10/2009, at 11:14 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Greg Wilkins wrote: >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> >>> I agree with that point of view. It seems sensible to use WebSocket >>> Protocol as the starting point, even if we see the need to add >>> features or otherwise change the protocol. There doesn't seem to >>> be a >>> strong case for starting from scratch. >> >> [...] I don't think the charter should mandate the WebSocket >> protocol as >> the outcome. >> >> The protocol should be able to be selected on it's own merits - and >> that >> includes the effort that many have put towards it already. > > I agree with Greg that it would be inappropriate for the WG to be > bound to > adopt a particular proposal or rubber-stamp a particular proposal. > > What matters much more is that the group's deliverables have the buy- > in of > the relevant implementors -- if we write a technology that is > intended to > be implemented by proxy vendors, then proxy vendors need to be > willing to > implement it. If we write a technology that is intended to be > implemented > by Web browsers, then Web browsers need to be willing to implement it. > Otherwise, we're just wasting our time writing boring science fiction. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E ) > \._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ > \ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- > (,_..'`-.;.' > _______________________________________________ > hybi mailing list > hybi@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- [hybi] updated Charter proposal Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (NATs and Fir… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Julian Reschke
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (Criteria) (w… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Julian Reschke
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Julian Reschke
- Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket) Greg Wilkins