Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket)

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Tue, 27 October 2009 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@opera.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAA628C21B for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfpRiupXccuq for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.opera.com (smtp.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AD628C218 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local (5355732C.cable.casema.nl [83.85.115.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n9RFDg5l005702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:13:43 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
References: <4ADEC7A0.7040307@ericsson.com> <4AE4CCBB.10001@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910260006420.9145@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AE553A0.9030208@ericsson.com> <73F5E810-F40F-42B8-81A9-4AD1306E360F@apple.com> <4AE57B62.4030209@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910270011060.13521@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AE6FC61.3070201@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:14:13 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.u2gslzrk64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
In-Reply-To: <4AE6FC61.3070201@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.00 (MacIntel)
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:14:07 -0000

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:57:53 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> My understanding is that you want the protocol to be implemented by Web  
> browsers, right? In which case the WG should make sure that those people  
> actually intend to join the working group.
>
> Having a consensus-driven process that doesn't involve those who are  
> supposed to implement the protocol would be a problem.

It seems representatives of all the "browser companies" are subscribed to  
this list. My understanding from joining the HTTP WG was that this is all  
it takes to be a member.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/