IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] WebSockets : Question about masqued frames !

Joel Martin <hybi@martintribe.org> Thu, 09 June 2011 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <buskanaka@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0111E8146 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JoI5i5Gl0Fzd for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com (mail-ew0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E5C11E8116 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so864216ewy.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=P5pcfqLCbaNFZezB+sdl70mdsFMI/WKcmWPvQ9DR6YE=; b=Akpq9Ef2bn0t59LBHPMuycn5AkvBg5dr7LNB6YJP7t/K/eOzxqDETE3EoKDVDKQxCd HP7mXUlhaZQPADls1C41Zz/QwWXPqasyV65hvqvvihCeqO+HbmF7XGtYsnc5f0Fv9xws yTcg25qSqDSfnoerDXDkBhEKnrhYsDNO2WJGQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=QjTbinUa8s6GJDgGrxjREHflrRwu+ithY794Ougz2cNBhQwbOKIggjXqcfvMlHPxHK uHXHepsDXDKixWaLXpRCbKr4X4S8KEH0Yvzhn+woKERXXhs7/EqRuos3EUtLJ8sb1oFM 0IixcpwbEYVqXetzJkZTRWUHtk6qTCtp12XfU=
Received: by 10.14.29.71 with SMTP id h47mr635526eea.106.1307656059375; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: buskanaka@gmail.com
Received: by 10.14.127.1 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <002101cc26b7$c8901c20$59b05460$@fr>
References: <002101cc26b7$c8901c20$59b05460$@fr>
From: Joel Martin <hybi@martintribe.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:47:19 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: F6xQ6yXY6r7jUWZWB9rVjDxpD-0
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=EzKgrR7wPjyT0K6xiEVYGYkU+rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jean-Christophe Bos <jczic@free.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba5bbae5e8502804a54e6665"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSockets : Question about masqued frames !
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:47:41 -0000

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jean-Christophe Bos <jczic@free.fr> wrote:

> Why have won so much space on the data payload length and lose
> unnecessarily 32b for the masks contained in each frame?
>

It is worth noting that the masking is only in the client -> server
direction.

Joel Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email