Re: [hybi] pointers, please?

"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> Thu, 16 April 2009 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362DD3A6BAF for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2VlXp4waMnYA for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from andrew.com (smtp3.andrew.com [198.135.207.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217603A6B9C for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_910__2009_04_15_21_25_00
X-SEF-16EBA1E9-99E8-4E1D-A1CA-4971F5510AF: 1
Received: from aopexbh2.andrew.com [10.86.20.25] by smtp3.andrew.com - SurfControl E-mail Filter (5.2.1); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:24:59 -0500
Received: from AHQEX1.andrew.com ([10.86.20.21]) by aopexbh2.andrew.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:04:28 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9BE37.ABF7C8A1"
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:04:26 -0500
Message-ID: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105A0CCF3@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF52D439-13B9-4E77-BE0A-2CB17D61E284@lindenlab.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [hybi] pointers, please?
Thread-Index: Acm+N24qfQY/euamSmapreoP1IGGeAAADDdw
References: <BF52D439-13B9-4E77-BE0A-2CB17D61E284@lindenlab.com>
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
To: Mark Lentczner <markl@lindenlab.com>, hybi@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2009 02:04:28.0169 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC672790:01C9BE37]
Subject: Re: [hybi] pointers, please?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:03:17 -0000

Congestion control was the reason cited at the last meeting.  It’s a good reason.

 

From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Lentczner
Sent: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:47 AM
To: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: [hybi] pointers, please?

 

	The same-origin security policy.

Can someone point me at a text on this?

 

Also, while I understand the difficulties that the two connection limit imposes on applications doing Comet/AJAX style operations, I couldn't seem to find a discussion of why that limit was added to HTTP?

 

I don't want to incite re-opening of these issues here - I'm just looking for pointers....   at least for now :-)

 

          - Mark

 

 

Mark Lentczner

Sr. Systems Architect

Technology Integration

Linden Lab

 

markl@lindenlab.com

 

Zero Linden

zero.linden@secondlife.com

 





 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]