IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Multiplexing: Pre-AddChannelResponse quota

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Wed, 13 June 2012 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E667321F856C for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wgkQoKO3E3Ie for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B1421F8564 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so399185yen.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=LALBIx9ARWpG5HXX3FtfG/QCbxqQKoMDay2nhmu+tS4=; b=SFkD9EEoUW5bRBFia66aqd9Bj82KqOoem8p2imKDRqF+JcJGF/eTV19mzTS2K8h2J8 1fWZdllvjzTgVoYKY2XKKy6nyTq9tX5kkgDlgywpQrYHIkfEyTACpLaaaWfwc6jFewCW c9ObXw5zrPcMuig7LIX+1W/eHgmfdshaASbcF25n9Q43hlnNtkmoxvainjhNZUhvMiC2 mhU8wKA231ZirkF8iH2ZT2ofyJuE24HecXR1fbL2tTj4vfNVBnMCHbATKwj/iYIiWO6S yrik2ulelwAkM+Itk1WVXgc5npPdwuG1J8hzpEWqlAQofITaShQ7UBNXOWJxILtZ9Ibc lPJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=LALBIx9ARWpG5HXX3FtfG/QCbxqQKoMDay2nhmu+tS4=; b=YwLviOF/W5ncnp8Svb6yCZTYfvP6K70eof8qaGKFiJw9HakhrOWQMZR9QeF4bBz+5L S/nQ+aF/EixeiGLBcmdzuZLyg6ZB/fM2zclR+5iqrNcgReapBsMTdcdoVfbnBDWdcTGu wxnk6hLXaduyxHHrFi6FBxVaC7ipTeTU3cZtHeNK6VH1JREVAe2bX0sji4s+cJgWYMMo HqKdQNLHBiXO56fChOuR/Dxa6+sLKTv6nFsEkIU9gX02HaYl84RPJey8SgR95Cvinulk aOG9x9toor46O2WCErq3wo6nlNZSeXwcL3ybC9axyU6/bmZpueVy4+7ihX6Xi/viMYWI WgEw==
Received: by 10.50.222.162 with SMTP id qn2mr2264212igc.46.1339583858774; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.222.162 with SMTP id qn2mr2264208igc.46.1339583858616; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.66.7 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <001001cd44a7$17c0a220$4741e660$@noemax.com>
References: <CAH9hSJZUAHQzDm4ofq6onc620SNretLQDOcjSnr2eQ0YA9yFdQ@mail.gmail.com> <002f01cd3cc4$4791b380$d6b51a80$@noemax.com> <20120607034440.GD26406@jl-vm1.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <001001cd44a7$17c0a220$4741e660$@noemax.com>
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:37:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJZDq9C-__7G0QSKk4Ww3=4d3Xji2yAOP3yZRt3nomuhpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arman Djusupov <arman@noemax.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9340fbf0a28db04c2582ce9"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQksEL+QfOzr0MutUjaK9Sji990ErQjVEUNtSJuK0Zf0oDobVjZtglB6InASA99LeNND4yAFNh7k0rX/lQHa6e8Ano/5DHk6SNuZJ4C3/OByxLTxQo2VkyKS2jOTkPDJxbeHAc6j
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Multiplexing: Pre-AddChannelResponse quota
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:37:40 -0000

Adopting both common and channel-wise pre-handshake quota sounds too much.
I slightly prefer to take only one of them.

I was wondering if the risk of head-of-line blocking on pre-handshake quota
is significant or not. That's why I proposed two-parameter method in the
first mail in this thread rather than common pre-handshake quota.

Any other opinions?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email