Re: [I18n-discuss] Draft UTR 53 and associated issues

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 06 October 2017 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: i18n-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18n-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E4813292F for <i18n-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=E4an0hdt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iO4UfCvo
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekCW6gDERqSm for <i18n-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76AF13219C for <i18n-discuss@iab.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA42B20E21; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:31:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 20:31:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=y7ti/6l1S73PNsTO8fn9hkYpB3iPLy2jQi0URkNuj rw=; b=E4an0hdtBIf6l7ha9LLuzxhSLOz6S6y5J4aeLKBl6dYlXlJteE5MB3LmE sDeeWbDAciwgsInfNBxYbc46SyKptUGB+N3doAFdifIlDL2pSbw08c0ZO57tBq6b iywT9XKET+YVd1/XPszoPgXwTYZqPF2prD+5P0dK60XO1WTMEU9dVo2cS7zlLLY1 ClWe4tpTlfpEbwEaypGsUFfSOZG08mkmyi/hSoEIuHAowRoHeitz32wrSSCxg1Ti Zfe4qQyVDpw5eImViL8OCzEDdvotsQttETZqnposfvCMCXwLRlLgJzAdpDcjjJgx M66GqK+eOUIO4dnDDe2iJboUj8BtA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=y7ti/6l1S73PNsTO8f n9hkYpB3iPLy2jQi0URkNujrw=; b=iO4UfCvorUWGjbIQdv1AJjk6bWtRQVS+gr zzqEs5Ag94wRyz2dwt6BR1xwvplVsIx+c7izoCIj3qwqkEjH1YjoMMF6g5CnnMcJ POIrGl1/D2xE0qn1K5acQ9S2JBEkFAjjtp1zm+dZuHKTkDwd53Qq+bYL8EeDjhbU 3Q4+UdX8itAk7+DWc0UFb6xEjmU58p4F/tHk0sZxcvaKE8pvb++mmFG2IjDjjLzS QWvIIEaA3jwZ5gLZMfo/1S/iKrHtlJPMfbuwbouQY0snMloqsPw18yNiFRKJm4X1 8gZ9BurZBMQ1SkTbjo3Bhm69TDNYrvrBEXY7ZOaaeekERzFszwbQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:087WWfB7yEFFT_Zbxth5jo5bbb-szXjFLu11_OOG1hXKKPFviFgnAA>
X-Sasl-enc: ZOH2NhbtF7NCcNtD1SAGbO0RsRXkTRDX2zvD0WRiH6uc 1507249874
Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.3.152]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 853912418B; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:31:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, i18n-discuss@iab.org
References: <07CBE38E286EBC149DD9EEF9@PSB> <6597e548-f7c6-0845-a0d3-f5c0fa92a100@ix.netcom.com> <B7F3FCEA6A57F0762637EE43@PSB>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <ccd2fbdc-53c0-f339-ef76-35bf806cb237@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 18:31:11 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B7F3FCEA6A57F0762637EE43@PSB>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2iJCD1xveWvrEk75kK8RD8RrQXd5l3wq4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18n-discuss/ioM4MyRPFHS0cahgwtYJSqiVTaw>
Subject: Re: [I18n-discuss] Draft UTR 53 and associated issues
X-BeenThere: i18n-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Program Open Discussion List <i18n-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/i18n-discuss>, <mailto:i18n-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18n-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18n-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18n-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/i18n-discuss>, <mailto:i18n-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:31:19 -0000

On 10/5/17 6:20 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Thursday, October 5, 2017 13:55 -0700 Asmus Freytag
> <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
>> There's an important clarification of scope that's missing
>> from the document, but can be found in the mail-thread on
>> idna-update.
>>
>> Implication for IETF may be less than it appears without that
>> clarified scope.
>>
>> A./
>>
>> PS: John, can you forward this as necessary - I'm not on all
>> the lists you sent this to.
> 
> That is the reason I tried to force the discussion onto the
> idna-update list and just tell people on the other two about it.
> Will pull the other two lists in as needed.  So far, silence on
> PRECIS, which is actually more likely to have problems than IDNA.

I did not see this message appear on the PRECIS list, but I do see it in
the archives. Perhaps cross-posting obscured from me the fact that it
was also posted to the PRECIS list.

Peter