Re: [I2nsf] please send us your slides for I2NSF WG session as soon as possible.

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3967130E1A for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:54:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qYBtX8JovisF for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2DDD130E29 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:54:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.26.143;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Linda Dunbar' <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, i2nsf@ietf.org
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B183693@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B183693@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 21:54:15 -0500
Message-ID: <005201d4770e$563cce20$02b66a60$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0053_01D476E4.6D684CC0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLEnsCXy7ZAac/p0gGJFKCdvJtGiaNk3w0A
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 181107-0, 11/07/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/XfB3917_OEoBtZeF0qwVOrIctV4>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] please send us your slides for I2NSF WG session as soon as possible.
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 02:54:30 -0000

I believe all of these drafts are ready for WG LC. 

 

Sue 

 

From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 6:57 AM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: [I2nsf] please send us your slides for I2NSF WG session as soon as
possible.

 

Linda

 

From: Linda Dunbar 
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2018 4:38 AM
To: 'i2nsf@ietf.org' <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Subject: In preparing for I2NSF WG session in Bangkok, please send us your
slides for I2NSF WG session as soon as possible. 

 

I2NSF session is on Wed afternoon. Please send us your slides for I2NSF WG
session as soon as possible.

 

We have several drafts on data models. Please emphasize the following points
in your presentation slides:

-        How is it aligned with the base NSF facing or Consumer facing data
models?

-        Why they cannot be merged together with the base models? 

-        Does your data models include the base models? 

-        Have the data models completed the compilation? 

 

 

Decision point if following is ready for WGLC? 

-
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection
/> https
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection
/> ://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection
/> / ??

-        <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability/ ??

-
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/>
https://datatracker..ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/>
/??

-
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/>
https
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/>
://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/> /
??

-
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface
-dm/> https
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface
-dm/>
://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface
-dm/> /??

 

 

Please read those drafts, so you can express the informed opionions. 

 

Thanks, Linda & Yoav