Re: [I2rs-proto-dt] Minutes for 10/2/2015 meeting

[Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:12:24PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> Please review the protocol strawman and send comments by Monday evening.  I
> will send sending out on Monday evening: 

There's an awful lot of TBD in there.  But given the ephemeral piece is the
critical and messy one, perhaps that's okay.

I can tell from looking at the slides that I've missed some of the
openconfig opstate discussions.  But from that, and prior context, it
appears that the "actual" configuration is being classified as "operational"
state and that the view that the devices receive comes from the logical
merge operation on that view plus the view through the panes of glass.

I sort of like the idea that a single client gets a single pane.  It
simplifies things, but potentially makes things a bit ugly for scaling if
you have too many clients.  This may be less of an issue if the models are
guaranteed some level of disjointness between various panes with regard to
their schemas.

I'm a bit confused by the writeable config false ephemeral true node.  Do we
really want to support that?

-- Jeff